Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Ryan . Oliver
> Just to say im not sure where your going but i hope to > have each compilier stored away for emulation, could be handy for lfs > users, Each compiler? Just do a multilib build, you only need one... Will release a new cross-lfs within the next 2 days or so, looks good so far for bi-arch x86

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Thomas Pegg
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > > Well it sounds like we'll have a good number of testers for the x86_64 > arch then :) > You can add me to the list of x86_64 testers. :) -- Thomas LFS User : 4729 / Linux User : 298329 kitt - Powered by: Linux 2.6.9-1.667 08:22:44 up 3 days, 22:05, 2 users, loa

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
jamie bennett wrote: Another x86_64'er here. Jeremy, are you using Ryan's scripts for your x86_64 builds or do you have your own x86_64 specific one? I ask as I'm going to enbark on a build tonight and wondered whether to use Ryan's or hack one up from the book. Well, Ryan's scripts are the author

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread jamie bennett
Quoting Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well it sounds like we'll have a good number of testers for the x86_64 > arch then :) Another x86_64'er here. Jeremy, are you using Ryan's scripts for your x86_64 builds or do you have your own x86_64 specific one? I ask as I'm going to enbark on a b

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Marty _ wrote: I dont mean to get on your toes or anything, but im doing the same thing. (result of endless tries of trying to get a stable amd64 and i686 compiles going symataniously with gcc in a secure enviroment) Im either almost finished or nowhere near, im still debugging right now. (208

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread John Miller
Jeremy Utley wrote: john wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: My intention in making this (nowhere near finished!) rendered version of the book available is so that it will answer a few questions about what cross-lfs is and aims to be, making it possible for more to get involved or interested in the bo

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-04 Thread Marty _
I dont mean to get on your toes or anything, but im doing the same thing. (result of endless tries of trying to get a stable amd64 and i686 compiles going symataniously with gcc in a secure enviroment) Im either almost finished or nowhere near, im still debugging right now. (208 installs of gli

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-03 Thread Jeremy Utley
john wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: My intention in making this (nowhere near finished!) rendered version of the book available is so that it will answer a few questions about what cross-lfs is and aims to be, making it possible for more to get involved or interested in the book, offer comments,

Re: Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-03 Thread john
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: My intention in making this (nowhere near finished!) rendered version of the book available is so that it will answer a few questions about what cross-lfs is and aims to be, making it possible for more to get involved or interested in the book, offer comments, suggestions,

Successful Build of Cross-LFS

2005-05-03 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Good Morning, For those who are interested, or curious, I have now had two successful builds resulting from the instructions found in the Cross-LFS book. It is no longer completely broken, however, it should still be regarded as under development and very unstable. If you would like to view it