Bernd Feldmeier wrote:
Hi to all,
sorry but as I know this release is bug fix release,
but this stuff has nothing to do with the
of any glibc/kernel stable versions. I think we should
upgrade to these stable versions before releasing ...
so we should use latest versions e.g. binutils 2.16.1 +
Bernd Feldmeier wrote:
so we should use latest versions e.g. binutils 2.16.1 +
kernel 2.6.14.x + glibc 2.3.5 ...
Like I said before,
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/ has those upgrades
already in place, except for linux-2.6.14.3, which should make it in
some time this w
Hi to all,
sorry but as I know this release is bug fix release,
but this stuff has nothing to do with the
of any glibc/kernel stable versions. I think we should
upgrade to these stable versions before releasing ...
so we should use latest versions e.g. binutils 2.16.1 +
kernel 2.6.14.x + glibc
Matthew Burgess wrote:
If you'd have been following the list since the time when we decided on
making a LFS-6.1.1 release, you'd have known that its only goal was to
fix the known bugs with LFS-6.1
Oh yeah, and LFS-6.1.1 was planned to be achieved under a very short
release schedule, due to
Bernd Feldmeier wrote:
Hi,
maybe you can tell me why we don't include this versions in LFS 6.1.1
like Greg do it??
If you'd have been following the list since the time when we decided on
making a LFS-6.1.1 release, you'd have known that its only goal was to
fix the known bugs with LFS-6.1
Bernd Feldmeier wrote:
Hi,
maybe you can tell me why we don't include this versions in LFS 6.1.1
like Greg do it??
They are stable and so there should not be any problems??
PS: I think we are too conservative about that.
Please tell me ...
regards
--http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/lis
