Matthew Burgess wrote:
If you'd have been following the list since the time when we decided on making a LFS-6.1.1 release, you'd have known that its only goal was to fix the known bugs with LFS-6.1
Oh yeah, and LFS-6.1.1 was planned to be achieved under a very short release schedule, due to this conservatism. However, due to the fact that this is a voluntary project and at least this volunteer, who just happens to be wearing the Release Managers hat at the moment, suddenly had an explosion of Real Life issues meant that the original timescales couldn't be met. In the meantime, of course, upstream package developers have churned out release after release, making the packages in LFS-6.1.1 look rather outdated.
Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
