Greg Schafer wrote:
> The bottom line is that you absolutely want your Glibc to be aware of
> new kernel syscalls otherwise there isn't a hope in hell of them ever
> being called by Glibc, even if you upgrade your kernel or user apps
> at a later date.
Yes. However, do you necessarily need to hav
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:22:02AM +1000, Greg Schafer wrote:
>
> The bottom line is that you absolutely want your Glibc to be aware of new
> kernel syscalls otherwise there isn't a hope in hell of them ever being
> called by Glibc, even if you upgrade your kernel or user apps at a later
> date. D
Archaic wrote:
> or better yet, does anyone see a need to include the new syscalls?
I'm surprised this question has been asked. It's Glibc FAQ material:
http://sources.redhat.com/glibc/glibc-faq.html#s-1.8
And for an explanation with more details, pls see here:
http://www.diy-linux.org/piperma
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:50:58PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Here's a simple program to test with archaic.
Thanks Jim. :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.
On 5/2/06, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the info, Dan. I forgot to ask (and it's OT according to the
subject line), but do you have some advice about testing the new
syscalls, or better yet, does anyone see a need to include the new
syscalls?
Maybe Greg will chime in if he's ar
Here's a simple program to test with archaic.
http://freshmeat.net/redir/inotify-tools/63227/url_tgz/inotify-tools-1.4.tar.gz
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Thanks for the info, Dan. I forgot to ask (and it's OT according to the
subject line), but do you have some advice about testing the new
syscalls, or better yet, does anyone see a need to include the new
syscalls?
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Harde
On 5/2/06, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't currently run anything that requires or even can use inotify
(that I'm aware of), but I need to test the inotify patch for inclusion
in the book. If anyone can provide me a simple method of testing (I'm
leaning towards dovecot) that also tests
