Feldmeier Bernd wrote:
Can someone tell me where
to get these like gentoo ones etc ...
These were pointed to by Tushar Teredesai within the last couple of
weeks in one of the kernel header threads on this very list. The
archives will have the info you're looking for.
BTW: why not to work
Gottfried Haider wrote:
Yes, this is the only relevant difference between 2.6.12.0 and svn.
so there is no problem adding a file to /usr/include/linux after the
system has been build (and glibc has been linked against it), if I
understand you correctly?
This applies only to this particula
On Son, 2005-12-25 at 17:22 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Gottfried Haider wrote:
>
> >I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus
> >Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6.
> >
> >I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running a
> Yes, this is the only relevant difference between 2.6.12.0 and svn.
so there is no problem adding a file to /usr/include/linux after the
system has been build (and glibc has been linked against it), if I
understand you correctly?
thanks|happy holidays
Gottfried Haider
--
http://linuxfromscratch
Gottfried Haider wrote:
Hello list,
I've successfully build a LFS system following svn - thus
Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 are in place - but I use kernel 2.6.15-rc6.
I think I'll have some use for inotify in the future (running an IMAP
server).. so can I simply copy inotif.h (from Linux-Libc-H
On 11/23/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know a couple of you were on the CC that Mariusz just sent out, but
> here's the little snippet for anyone else that's interested:
>
> "I'm aiming at releasing 2.6.14 during the first weekend of December and
> assuming nothing more importa
On 11/10/05, Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/10/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
> > > frequently as it once was.
> >
> > I thought that too, and also found the
On 11/10/05, Thomas Pegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> >
> >> Does someone have an idea on what the source based distros are using?
> >
> >
> > Gentoo appears to be using their own, I think -
> > http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?linux-headers-2
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Does someone have an idea on what the source based distros are using?
Gentoo appears to be using their own, I think -
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?linux-headers-2.6.11-r2. I can't
see any links to the actual tarball though that would e
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Does someone have an idea on what the source based distros are using?
Gentoo appears to be using their own, I think -
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?linux-headers-2.6.11-r2. I can't
see any links to the actual tarball though that would enable a full
comparison,
On Thursday 10 November 2005 18:48, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> Does someone have an idea on what the source based distros are using?
Gentoo uses 2.6.11-r2 (as of lkast weekend).
--
Mid-Twenties Breakdown:
A period of mental collapse occurring in one's twenties,
often caused by an inability
On 11/10/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > On 11/10/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, looks like they made a 2.6.12.0 release but it is not on thier
> > download site.
>
> Sure it is. :) And it's what we've been using in trunk for a w
On 11/10/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> > It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
> > frequently as it once was.
>
> I thought that too, and also found the svnweb interface that Tush linked
> to. Now, whether they actually re
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
frequently as it once was.
I thought that too, and also found the svnweb interface that Tush linked
to. Now, whether they actually release something based on 2.6.14
remains to be seen - maybe someone
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
On 11/10/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
frequently as it once was. Two questions:
1) I realize it may not be absolutely necessary to have matching
linux-libc-headers and kernel versions,
On 11/10/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems that the linux-libc-headers package isn't being updated as
> frequently as it once was. Two questions:
>
> 1) I realize it may not be absolutely necessary to have matching
> linux-libc-headers and kernel versions, but wouldn't it
Duncan Webb wrote:
So the cleanest thing would be to do as the FAQ says and empty
linux/config.h.
Nope, the cleanest thing to do is to fix user space applications that
are broken in their thinking that including a kernel space header is a
Good Idea (which it isn't, as is explained in the llh
Andrew Benton wrote:
Tobias Lieber wrote:
I think that there's a small problem with installation of chapter 10
Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 installation.
I creates a the file /usr/include/linux/config.h with the lines:
#error "Compilation aborted. Please read the FAQ for
linux-libc-headers p
Tobias Lieber wrote:
I think that there's a small problem with installation of chapter 10
Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 installation.
I creates a the file /usr/include/linux/config.h with the lines:
#error "Compilation aborted. Please read the FAQ for linux-libc-headers
package."
#error "(can be
> I think that there's a small problem with installation of chapter 10
> Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 installation.
>
> I creates a the file /usr/include/linux/config.h with the lines:
> #error "Compilation aborted. Please read the FAQ for linux-libc-headers
> package."
> #error "(can be found at
20 matches
Mail list logo
