I hacked out the problem with e2fsprogs, but it was a problem again with
openssl.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Robert Connolly wrote:
Hi. Uhm, using glibc-20050321. I get this in chapter 5's adjusting:
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ cc dummy.c
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/mnt/l
Another showstopper from e2fsprogs-1.35:
/lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [test_icount] Error 1
make[2]:
Robert Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On March 21, 2005 10:13 pm, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> Robert Connolly wrote:
>> > Hi. Uhm, using glibc-20050321.
>>
>> Which binutils version? Since the error is coming from ld, I would
>> suspect that it's binutils first (thou
Ahha. Using ld version 2.15.96 20050308 and all is well (no error). So, use:
ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.15.96.tar.bz2
if you want to use the latest Glibc.
BTW, I think FSF binutils-2.16 is scheduled for April.
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
On March 21, 2005 10:13 pm, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
> > Hi. Uhm, using glibc-20050321.
>
> Which binutils version? Since the error is coming from ld, I would
> suspect that it's binutils first (though that's basically a guess).
$ ld --version
GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2.2 200
Robert Connolly wrote:
Hi. Uhm, using glibc-20050321.
Which binutils version? Since the error is coming from ld, I would
suspect that it's binutils first (though that's basically a guess).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-d
