El Jueves, 4 de Mayo de 2006 23:29, Jim Gifford escribió:
> The biggest problem I've had about the md5sums in ALFS is that they are
> ones we have created. We shouldn't be recreating them, but using the
> author's version. I know we have repackages items so they are .bz2, but
> that's not keeping a
The biggest problem I've had about the md5sums in ALFS is that they are
ones we have created. We shouldn't be recreating them, but using the
author's version. I know we have repackages items so they are .bz2, but
that's not keeping a clean chain. That's my objection. If we are not
going to prov
El Jueves, 4 de Mayo de 2006 02:42, Archaic escribió:
> jhalfs was discussed in dozens of threads a long time ago. What you are
> arguing against is a method to test the book directly from it's XML.
And that was one of the goals listed in the specifications when the work on
the newxml format was
Archaic wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:36:53PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
>>>
>> I can understand that, but we should just provide a link to the sources
>> md5 instead of creating our own. It helps prevent any contamination of
>> the file by us.
>
> Not every package has an md5 file. None
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
Perhaps you should visit more often. ;) There have been a few udev
rules
threads that I'd appreciate your comments on, too.
I've never seen a ticket assigned to me to answer questions. After
all that's why we have the ticket system in place.
I th
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:36:53PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> >
> I can understand that, but we should just provide a link to the sources
> md5 instead of creating our own. It helps prevent any contamination of
> the file by us.
Not every package has an md5 file. None of our patches do, eithe
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 05/03/06 20:36 CST:
I've never seen a ticket assigned to me to answer questions. After all
that's why we have the ticket system in place.
You mean you've been monitoring the lists and because nobody assigned
you a ticket, you have
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 05/03/06 20:36 CST:
> I've never seen a ticket assigned to me to answer questions. After all
> that's why we have the ticket system in place.
You mean you've been monitoring the lists and because nobody assigned
you a ticket, you haven't contributed to any thread
Jim Gifford wrote:
Perhaps you should visit more often. ;) There have been a few udev rules
threads that I'd appreciate your comments on, too.
I've never seen a ticket assigned to me to answer questions. After all
that's why we have the ticket system in place.
I think perhaps we have diffe
Archaic wrote:
jhalfs was discussed in dozens of threads a long time ago. What you are
arguing against is a method to test the book directly from it's XML.
That is extremely powerful. And if it is the MD5s you don't like, I
cannot understand that, either. It is common (and recommended) practice
t
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 04:43:30PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
>
> I see to many conflicts of interest. I see a lot of ALFS stuff getting
> merged into the LFS book, with no real discussion.
jhalfs was discussed in dozens of threads a long time ago. What you are
arguing against is a method to test
Jim Gifford wrote:
I see to many conflicts of interest. I see a lot of ALFS stuff getting
merged into the LFS book, with no real discussion.
What do you mean "a lot of ALFS stuff"? You've commented on one idea
today, the md5sums, that is ALFS-oriented. What else are you referring to?
--
JH
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
