On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Jonathan Oksman wrote:
> I was curious about these compiler warnings so I decided to look into
> it a bit further through various logs. At a glance it looks as though
> the issue is that gmp, mpfr and mpc are all using hardwired paths to
> /usr/bin/file or /bin/
Jonathan Oksman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> The old way worked OK, but just issued some warnings. Â Remember that the
>> builds in Chapter 6 *are* using the new gcc and binutils that you built
>> in Chapter 5.
>>
>
> This is true. The difference appears to be
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The old way worked OK, but just issued some warnings. Remember that the
> builds in Chapter 6 *are* using the new gcc and binutils that you built
> in Chapter 5.
>
This is true. The difference appears to be about 20 bytes on the file
binary
Jonathan Oksman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> There are multiple ways of solving a problem. What new problem does
>> your suggestion solve?
> I suppose my arguments are a matter of opinion though. I'm in the
> process of a test build with this suggested rearran
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> There are multiple ways of solving a problem. What new problem does
> your suggestion solve?
>
> -- Bruce
Well most of it is just a personal intent of building as many binaries
as possible with the new (and fully tested) gcc. Since file
Jonathan Oksman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Changelog, 2011-04-18.
>>
>> Â -- Bruce
>
> Thanks for the reference Bruce, I completely missed it.
>
>
> From the changelog then:
>> [bdubbs] - In Chapter 6, move File to before binutils to prevent some
>> config
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Changelog, 2011-04-18.
>
> -- Bruce
Thanks for the reference Bruce, I completely missed it.
From the changelog then:
> [bdubbs] - In Chapter 6, move File to before binutils to prevent some
> configure warnings.
I was curious about these
Jonathan Oksman wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I was just wondering if there was a special reason as to why file gets
> built before gcc now in 7.0. I tried to do a search to see if it was
> discussed but I could not turn up anything.
Changelog, 2011-04-18.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/m
