Jonathan Oksman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There are multiple ways of solving a problem. What new problem does >> your suggestion solve?
> I suppose my arguments are a matter of opinion though. I'm in the > process of a test build with this suggested rearrangement due to > curiosity. I have my doubts that it will have a major impact on the > build of file, but I'll know in a little bit once I can do a diff. The old way worked OK, but just issued some warnings. Remember that the builds in Chapter 6 *are* using the new gcc and binutils that you built in Chapter 5. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
