Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> OK, I don't have time for studying it now, but I did misunderstand the
> proposal.
> I'll go back and study it some more.
>
I'm working on Gnome again right now, but I'll put up a copy of the book
in my home dir with the proposed changes on Friday evening if I have the
ti
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Woah..reading a bit too much into it. As David correctly pointed out,
> I'm only suggesting that creating the basic filesystem (sections
> 6.2-6.6) be reordered, or rather reworked.
>
> Creating packages at build time is the goal, however, the packages would
> be installed i
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Can you explain what you mean by "create the entire 'base'".
>>>
>>>
>> Again, looking at this from a packaging point of view, IMO, all files
>> and directories that are created manually should be together on one
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:31:14 +
david zorg wrote:
> Bruce, i think you're misunderstanding DJ's proposal - it sounds to me
> like he's saying that if the creation of the file-system heirachy and
> the essential files for the final system was done all on one page of
> the book, it would make it
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:03:14 -0600
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
> > Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Can you explain what you mean by "create the entire 'base'".
> >>
> > Again, looking at this from a packaging point of view, IMO, all
> > files and directories that are created manually should b
Hello there:
Maybe this is irrelevant and I hope I don't offend anyone...
I've been working on a LFS package manager that works out of the tools
available in the "tools" directory (plus rsync and file) and that I could
use to manage my LFS servers.
I used the union-fs tools and I believe I
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Can you explain what you mean by "create the entire 'base'".
>>
> Again, looking at this from a packaging point of view, IMO, all files
> and directories that are created manually should be together on one page
> so that a single package can be generated
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Can you explain what you mean by "create the entire 'base'".
>
Again, looking at this from a packaging point of view, IMO, all files
and directories that are created manually should be together on one page
so that a single package can be generated and called 'lfs-base' or
DJ Lucas wrote:
> chapter 4?
>
UGH. I was thinking that 6.2 was at the end of chapter 5. Anyway, the
request is to merge virtual file systems page with creating directories
and the last 3 of 6.6 so that all directories and files that are
manually created (with the exception of links that wi
DJ Lucas wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>> a technical reason not to create the entire 'base' while in chapter 4?
>>
> Oops, that should have been 'chapter 5'.
Can you explain what you mean by "create the entire 'base'".
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: htt
DJ Lucas wrote:
> a technical reason not to create the entire 'base' while in chapter 4?
>
Oops, that should have been 'chapter 5'.
-- DJ Lucas
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
11 matches
Mail list logo
