Re: Not-For-Profit (part of Future of LFS discussion)

2008-05-19 Thread TheOldFellow
On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:39:05 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > TheOldFellow wrote: >> On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:06:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >>> TheOldFellow wrote: >> (Bruce, give my warm regards to Austin - a fine city that I have >> enjoyed on a number of occasions, mind you, I also like Dallas,

Re: Not-For-Profit (part of Future of LFS discussion)

2008-05-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
TheOldFellow wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:06:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> TheOldFellow wrote: >>> Could some kind American or Canadian soul post a link to something that >>> explains this concept as it applies to a corporation? > > > My thanks to Jaqui and Bruce for the info - very diff

Re: Not-For-Profit (part of Future of LFS discussion)

2008-05-19 Thread TheOldFellow
On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:06:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > TheOldFellow wrote: >> Could some kind American or Canadian soul post a link to something that >> explains this concept as it applies to a corporation? My thanks to Jaqui and Bruce for the info - very different from the UK situation. It

Re: Not-For-Profit (part of Future of LFS discussion)

2008-05-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
TheOldFellow wrote: > Could some kind American or Canadian soul post a link to something that > explains this concept as it applies to a corporation? I think some of us > Non-NA peeps could do with an understanding of that it means, and IANAL! > I presume it cheaper than a Delaware Corporation

Re: Not-For-Profit (part of Future of LFS discussion)

2008-05-19 Thread J. Greenlees
TheOldFellow wrote: > Could some kind American or Canadian soul post a link to something that > explains this concept as it applies to a corporation? I think some of us > Non-NA peeps could do with an understanding of that it means, and IANAL! > I presume it cheaper than a Delaware Corporation