Archaic wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:27:01PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
Anyone having issues with any of the above feel free to point fingers
and laugh in my general direction, oh and anything more constructive
would be appreciated too :-)
There are still bugs that need to be dealt
On 5/22/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the 'Locale Related Issues' page in BLFS it opens with:
"This page contains information about locale related problems and
issues. In this paragraph you'll find a generic overview of things
that can come up when configuring your system for
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 05/22/06 08:52 CST:
> I think I understand your concern here. A note in BLFS saying that
> multibyte locale support in LFS/BLFS is new and not fully tested for
> each package, along with the reminder to check the wiki for user notes
> should suffice don't yo
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
1) BLFS still has http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1957 .
Since BLFS has marked this as WONTFIX, the fact that BLFS includes known
broken applications without notice must be mentioned in LFS, and support
should be disclaimed completely. Ideally, it shoul
Matthew Burgess wrote:
1) Package freeze (Wed. 24th)
2) Cut an RC1 (Wed. 24th)
3) Release (Wed. 31st)
Sorry, I cannot agree with this plan.
1) BLFS still has http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1957 . Since BLFS
has marked this as WONTFIX, the fact that BLFS includes known broken
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:20:53PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Archaic,
>Can you provide a link to that post?
I'll link to every pending lfs-dev item in my inbox. The first one is a
summary with several more links (some of which are already dealt with).
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/l
Archaic,
Can you provide a link to that post?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:27:01PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> Anyone having issues with any of the above feel free to point fingers
> and laugh in my general direction, oh and anything more constructive
> would be appreciated too :-)
There are still bugs that need to be dealt with. Some
