On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:58:51AM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> If you mean that, then you won't go. Plain and simple.
I suppose I was a little rash and hasty. I've also been told that I'm
too sensitive and need a thicker skin. :)
The number of requests for me to stay (both here and in private)
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Don't speak about the project, because you're not correct in
> that assumption. What is best for you, well, only you can
> determine that. But think about what I (and others) have
> said. You're presence is good for the community.
I had no intention of replying to this thre
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:35:00 +
TheOldFellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry but I can't continue to take this mailing list. Despite
> request by Gerard to STFU, the noise continues. I had hoped that ther
> was some hope for a new project, one that I might enjoy being part of.
> But the
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> I am very surprised the nobody replied to my mail with the subject
> "RPM: proof of concept".
It is lost in the thread. With threading on, I am struggling to find it
again. You might start a new thread.
I haven't tried your method but I expect it works as advert
Alan Lord wrote:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>> 2008/3/3, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> * PM (This is very a technical issue and an emotive one, probably one of
>>> the most important too as it may affect everything that follows in LFS-NG)
>> I am very surprised the nobody replied to my m
On Δευ, Μάρ 03, at 01:58 Randy McMurchy wrote:
[...]
What Randy says.
Jeremy, please follow his advices blindly.
--
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/Hacking
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above i
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> 2008/3/3, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> * PM (This is very a technical issue and an emotive one, probably one of
>> the most important too as it may affect everything that follows in LFS-NG)
>
> I am very surprised the nobody replied to my mail with the subject
2008/3/3, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * PM (This is very a technical issue and an emotive one, probably one of
> the most important too as it may affect everything that follows in LFS-NG)
I am very surprised the nobody replied to my mail with the subject
"RPM: proof of concept".
> * Prese
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Positive support for Jeremy...
>
> If you mean that, then you won't go. Plain and simple.
>
+1. Well said Randy.
I also do not know who Richard meant, but I didn't take it to be about
Jeremy either.
Now, forwards please...
We have had many great comments and suggestion
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 03/02/08 16:35 CST:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
>> I'm sorry but I can't continue to take this mailing list. Despite
>> request by Gerard to STFU, the noise continues. I had hoped that ther
>> was some hope for a new project, one that I might enjoy being part of.
>>
TheOldFellow wrote:
> I'm sorry but I can't continue to take this mailing list. Despite
> request by Gerard to STFU, the noise continues. I had hoped that ther
> was some hope for a new project, one that I might enjoy being part of.
> But there is ONE character who's ego is larger than I can take
11 matches
Mail list logo
