Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:19:13AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:26:42AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
I don't share your optimism that upstream will accept this,
although I hope I'm wrong. For the moment, 182 is good enough
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:19:13AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:26:42AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >> I don't share your optimism that upstream will accept this,
> >> although I hope I'm wrong. For the moment, 182 is good enough.
>
> I've been watc
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:19:18 +0100
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been watching the mailing lists and William Hubbs has been trying
> to get a set of patches into systemd for several days. He is being
> ignored by upstream AFAICT. They have seemed quite arrogant about it in
> the past when they h
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:26:42AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> I don't share your optimism that upstream will accept this,
>> although I hope I'm wrong. For the moment, 182 is good enough.
I've been watching the mailing lists and William Hubbs has been trying
to get a set of
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:26:42AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I don't share your optimism that upstream will accept this,
> although I hope I'm wrong. For the moment, 182 is good enough.
>
> However, I will have a go at merging the write_{cd,net} rules stuff
> from 182 into udev-config so that
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:07:56PM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
> We *could* apply the patch, then autoreconf, then regenerate a new
> patch, for LFS (to avoid pkg-config or other weirdness causing issues in
> chapter 6's autoreconf run).
>
Missed this part : Bruce reinstated pkg-config earlie
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:07:39AM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 20:07 -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
> > We *could* apply the patch, then autoreconf, then regenerate a new
> > patch, for LFS (to avoid pkg-config or other weirdness causing issues in
> > chapter 6's autoreconf r
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 20:07 -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> We *could* apply the patch, then autoreconf, then regenerate a new
> patch, for LFS (to avoid pkg-config or other weirdness causing issues in
> chapter 6's autoreconf run). Or we could give it a while (leaving the
> book at udev-182) and se
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 04:21:05PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> $ ls -l /lib/udev
>>> total 1528
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 196379 May 21 15:41 accelerometer
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 91401 May 21 15:41 ata_id
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 138252 May 21 1
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 04:21:05PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> $ ls -l /lib/udev
>> total 1528
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 196379 May 21 15:41 accelerometer
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 91401 May 21 15:41 ata_id
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 138252 May 21 15:41 cdrom_id
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:53:55PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Then the script in mountvirtfs already does:
>>>
>>> # Copy devices that Udev >= 155 doesn't handle to /dev
>>> cp -a /lib/udev/devices/* /dev
>>>
>>>-- Bruce
>> I'll need to look at *wh
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:53:55PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > ---
> >
> > Then the script in mountvirtfs already does:
> >
> > # Copy devices that Udev >= 155 doesn't handle to /dev
> > cp -a /lib/udev/devices/* /dev
> >
> >-- Bruce
>
> I'll need to look at *why* that isn't w
Ken Moffat wrote:
>> All the udev supporting programs should end up in /lib/udev:
>>
>> $ ls -l /lib/udev
>> total 1528
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 196379 May 21 15:41 accelerometer
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 91401 May 21 15:41 ata_id
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 138252 May 21 15:41 cdrom_id
>> -rwxr-x
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 04:21:05PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > This use of /usr/lib makes sense for me, but I haven't yet attended
> > to moving the libs to /lib, so accelerometer and cdrom_id will not
> > work until /usr has been mounted.
>
> I didn't know what accelero
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:11:23PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > # Start the udev daemon to continually watch for, and act on,
> > # uevents
> > /lib/udev/udevd --daemon
> >
> > # crude fix for udev > 182
> > mkdir -p /dev/pts
>
> That's not ne
Ken Moffat wrote:
> This use of /usr/lib makes sense for me, but I haven't yet attended
> to moving the libs to /lib, so accelerometer and cdrom_id will not
> work until /usr has been mounted.
I didn't know what accelerometer did. It is for tablets and phones to
tell the orientation of the de
Ken Moffat wrote:
> # Start the udev daemon to continually watch for, and act on,
> # uevents
> /lib/udev/udevd --daemon
>
> # crude fix for udev > 182
> mkdir -p /dev/pts
That's not necessary. Create at install time:
$ ls -lR /lib/udev/devices/
/lib/udev/devices/
17 matches
Mail list logo
