On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:26:42AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I don't share your optimism that upstream will accept this,
> although I hope I'm wrong. For the moment, 182 is good enough.
>
> However, I will have a go at merging the write_{cd,net} rules stuff
> from 182 into udev-config so that it's ready if/when we are able to
> move forward.
>
Finally got a round tuit. I've created udev-config-20120613.tar.xz
and put it at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/udev-config-20120613/
together with a patch for udev-config : that's still in my local
repo, no point committing it until we have a plan to move beyond
182. It's there if I get run over by a bus.
I can't test the rules (only one network interface and one cd/dvd
per machine), but if they worked in 182 they should still work.
I've now built xorg and as far as firefox, so fairly confident that
libudev is adequate.
As before I'm building with --libdir=/usr/lib and now I've added
the following two instructions, based on what we do for ncurses:
mv -v /usr/lib/libudev.so* /lib
ln -sfv ../../lib/libudev.so.1.0.1 /usr/lib/libudev.so
I don't have the static libs, so I know anything linking to libudev
has to be using the .so, and I haven't altered libudev.la : it still
refers to /usr/lib, but merely symlinking .so (and ignoring .so.1
and.so.1.0.1) appears to be adequate.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
