Aleksey Rybalkin wrote:
> Hi Bruce.
>
> I suggest to move `udevadm hwdb --update` up to the chapter in the book
> (from Makefile.lfs). With that change fakeroot/DESTDIR folks can easily
> move that line to their post-upgrades/post-installs.
>
> Right now `make DESTDIR= -f udev-lfs-196/Makefile.lfs
Hi Bruce.
I suggest to move `udevadm hwdb --update` up to the chapter in the book
(from Makefile.lfs). With that change fakeroot/DESTDIR folks can easily
move that line to their post-upgrades/post-installs.
Right now `make DESTDIR= -f udev-lfs-196/Makefile.lfs install`
does not work with that ins
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
>> *Presumably* (without having actually looked at it) this database would
>> be mapping from hardware IDs (vendor/device pairs, etc.) to human
>> readable description strings, so I'd be surprised if 105 bytes was
>> sufficient, yeah. Is there anything r
Am 21.11.2012 18:21, schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
> I've been testing udev from systemd-196. I have been able to build and
> install it with some changes to the LFS Makefile. One new capability is
> that it has it's own hw database instead of lspci and lsusb.
udev/systemd gets uglier with each release...
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> *Presumably* (without having actually looked at it) this database would
> be mapping from hardware IDs (vendor/device pairs, etc.) to human
> readable description strings, so I'd be surprised if 105 bytes was
> sufficient, yeah. Is there anything readable in there? (Might
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:21:21AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been testing udev from systemd-196. I have been able to build and
> install it with some changes to the LFS Makefile. One new capability is
> that it has it's own hw database instead of lspci and lsusb.
>
> The raw db files go
