Re: [lfs-dev] kbd-2.0.0 seems to require check

2013-09-19 Thread Igor Živković
On 2013-09-18 18:50, Igor Živković wrote: > On 2013-09-18 18:36, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Matthew Burgess wrote: >>> >>> >>> PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgconfig ./configure --prefix=/usr >>> --disable-vlock >> >> ??? That's already in the book at SVN-20130915. > > Yes, indeed, it is. Somehow jhal

Re: [lfs-dev] kbd-2.0.0 seems to require check

2013-09-18 Thread Matt Burgess
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:36 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Matthew Burgess wrote: > > > > Darn! I hit that, changed it locally but somehow lost it prior to the > > commit. I'll fix up tonight. In the meantime, if you haven't already > > done so, you can use: > > > > PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgco

Re: [lfs-dev] kbd-2.0.0 seems to require check

2013-09-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Igor Živković wrote: >> On 2013-09-18 18:36, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Matthew Burgess wrote: PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgconfig ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-vlock >>> >>> ??? That's already in the book at SVN-20130915. >> >> Yes, indeed, it is. Someho

Re: [lfs-dev] kbd-2.0.0 seems to require check

2013-09-18 Thread Igor Živković
On 2013-09-18 18:36, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Matthew Burgess wrote: >> >> >> PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgconfig ./configure --prefix=/usr >> --disable-vlock > > ??? That's already in the book at SVN-20130915. Yes, indeed, it is. Somehow jhalfs didn't pick it up. By the way, the latest generate

Re: [lfs-dev] kbd-2.0.0 seems to require check

2013-09-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Igor Živković wrote: > On 2013-09-18 18:36, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Matthew Burgess wrote: >>> >>> >>> PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgconfig ./configure --prefix=/usr >>> --disable-vlock >> >> ??? That's already in the book at SVN-20130915. > > Yes, indeed, it is. Somehow jhalfs didn't pick it up. By

Re: [lfs-dev] kbd-2.0.0 seems to require check

2013-09-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:00:27 +0200, Igor Živković > wrote: > >> checking for CHECK... no >> configure: error: Package requirements (check >= 0.9.4) were not met: >> >> No package 'check' found >> >> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you >> ins

Re: [lfs-dev] kbd-2.0.0 seems to require check

2013-09-18 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:00:27 +0200, Igor Živković wrote: > checking for CHECK... no > configure: error: Package requirements (check >= 0.9.4) were not met: > > No package 'check' found > > Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > installed software in a non-standard