Re: [lfs-dev] Systemd branch created

2013-02-18 Thread cybertao
Yeah, I think there were a couple of things out of place or missing. It's been a while since I compiled LFS so was sort of fuddling through it anyway. The post-LFS hint the and how-to someone posted in the blfs mailing list helped a lot. I'm about to try it again, this time in 32-bit. I'll write

Re: [lfs-dev] Systemd branch created

2013-02-15 Thread Armin K.
On 02/15/2013 05:31 AM, cybertao wrote: > I just finished building this, ironed out my mistakes (journald barfing > because there's no machine-id is a good one!), and couldn't be more > pleased with myself. And immensely grateful for all the work that went > into this. > > Thanks. > > I'm glad I'

Re: [lfs-dev] Systemd branch created

2013-02-15 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:31:05 +1300, cybertao wrote: > I just finished building this, ironed out my mistakes (journald barfing > because there's no machine-id is a good one!), and couldn't be more > pleased > with myself. And immensely grateful for all the work that went into this. Thanks for the

Re: [lfs-dev] Systemd branch created

2013-02-14 Thread cybertao
I just finished building this, ironed out my mistakes (journald barfing because there's no machine-id is a good one!), and couldn't be more pleased with myself. And immensely grateful for all the work that went into this. Thanks. On 6 February 2013 10:34, Matt Burgess wrote: > Hi all, > > I'v

Re: [lfs-dev] Systemd branch created

2013-02-05 Thread Nathan Coulson
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just created a systemd branch for LFS. The intention behind this > is to provide a version of the book with systemd fully integrated, > without the need for post-lfs changes. This in no way means that > systemd will make it i