- Mail original -
> De: "Jeremy Huntwork"
> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Mai 2012 22:19:27
> Objet: [lfs-dev] Suggestion
>
> Greetings all,
>
> Consider two things:
>
> 1. We all hate long build times. Anything we can (reasonably and
> accurately do) to speed
On 5/9/12 4:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Total 5 minutes + 42 seconds
Yes, the actual machine time is not as great a savings as I would like,
however it does make a huge dent in user time for manual builds - no
matter what, everyone goes through the manual build process of LFS at
least once
On 5/9/12 4:38 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> The only concern I would have is whether or not the use of busybox will
> alter the results of any configure scripts. Assuming testing shows it
> doesn't, then I've no objections at all to a mockup with a view to
> getting this merged relatively quickly.
Y
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> Consider two things:
>
> 1. We all hate long build times. Anything we can (reasonably and
> accurately do) to speed up the build we do.
> 2. Chapter 5 are a set of throwaway tools (in some cases we only build
> just what we want out of those tools, ag
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:19 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Thoughts? If interested, I could start a mockup in the jh branch.
Interesting suggestion! From my latest chapter 5 build, that would
shave 9.5 minutes off of the 74 minute build time (~13%). Assuming that
it takes less than 9.5 minutes
