On 02/12/2013 10:24 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:20 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>
>> Hm, am I missing something or D-Bus isn't there? It's required iirc ...
>> You can't run systemd without it.
>
> Err, whoops :-) I told you I hadn't run a build yet, and there's the
> proof! If y
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:20 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Hm, am I missing something or D-Bus isn't there? It's required iirc ...
> You can't run systemd without it.
Err, whoops :-) I told you I hadn't run a build yet, and there's the
proof! If you give me an hour or so, I'll add it in.
Regards,
On 02/12/2013 10:06 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 17:20 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>
>> Alright, no problem. I'll do the polishing thing then.
>
> Lovely, thanks, that branch is all yours now :-) If there's anything
> you want a hand with, feel free to shout!
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt.
>
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 17:20 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Alright, no problem. I'll do the polishing thing then.
Lovely, thanks, that branch is all yours now :-) If there's anything
you want a hand with, feel free to shout!
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FA
On 02/12/2013 11:26 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:48:28 +0100, "Armin K." wrote:
>
>> Also, I just merged expat into systemd branch, but there is no commit
>> message. I am subscribed to lfs-book. What am I doing wrong?
>
> Bruce already covered the commit message issue. I'v
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:48:28 +0100, "Armin K." wrote:
> Also, I just merged expat into systemd branch, but there is no commit
> message. I am subscribed to lfs-book. What am I doing wrong?
Bruce already covered the commit message issue. I've actually got all of
systemd and its dependencies in m
Armin K. wrote:
> Also, I just merged expat into systemd branch, but there is no commit
> message. I am subscribed to lfs-book. What am I doing wrong?
I doubt you are doing anything wrong. The changes are in svn, but I
don't see any message in mailman (lfs-book) about invalid posters.
However,
On 02/12/2013 01:46 AM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 01:42 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 01:10 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I am trying to keep LFS and LFS Systemd as close as possible -
>>> that's all. In that case, we would just need to change ENABLE_LOG=0 in
>>> init
On 02/12/2013 01:42 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 01:10 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>
>> Well, I am trying to keep LFS and LFS Systemd as close as possible -
>> that's all. In that case, we would just need to change ENABLE_LOG=0 in
>> init-functioins for systemd branch.
>
> OK then, at
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 01:10 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Well, I am trying to keep LFS and LFS Systemd as close as possible -
> that's all. In that case, we would just need to change ENABLE_LOG=0 in
> init-functioins for systemd branch.
OK then, at least I understood it correctly :-) The patch is
On 02/12/2013 01:05 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 00:27 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>
>> Still no one replied about the patch :(
>
> OK, I guess I just don't quite get it :-)
>
> I see that it allows one to configure whether or not stuff is logged
> to /run/var/bootlog. I think the co
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 00:27 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Still no one replied about the patch :(
OK, I guess I just don't quite get it :-)
I see that it allows one to configure whether or not stuff is logged
to /run/var/bootlog. I think the comments in your original email mean
that:
1) Logging to
On 02/12/2013 12:15 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 23:50 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>> On 02/11/2013 01:22 AM, Armin K. wrote:
>>> Not useful for systemd since it logs anything to journal. Still enable
>>> it by default on LFS.
>>>
>>> I guess we would want to use this for lfs/systemd
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 23:50 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/11/2013 01:22 AM, Armin K. wrote:
> > Not useful for systemd since it logs anything to journal. Still enable
> > it by default on LFS.
> >
> > I guess we would want to use this for lfs/systemd branch, but we need
> > some kind of new bootsc
On 02/11/2013 01:22 AM, Armin K. wrote:
> Not useful for systemd since it logs anything to journal. Still enable
> it by default on LFS.
>
> I guess we would want to use this for lfs/systemd branch, but we need
> some kind of new bootscripts package which will include init-functions
> (needed by al
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 01:22 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Matt, since you removed Sysvinit package from LFS Systemd branch, I
> wonder if we should add it back, but only make it install few utils. All
> distros that use Systemd still ship package as "systemd-utils" which
> contains the following uti
16 matches
Mail list logo
