On 02/12/2013 01:46 AM, Armin K. wrote: > On 02/12/2013 01:42 AM, Matt Burgess wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 01:10 +0100, Armin K. wrote: >> >>> Well, I am trying to keep LFS and LFS Systemd as close as possible - >>> that's all. In that case, we would just need to change ENABLE_LOG=0 in >>> init-functioins for systemd branch. >> >> OK then, at least I understood it correctly :-) The patch is fine for >> trunk. For the systemd branch, feel free to re-create the bootscripts >> directory and pop the patched init-functions back in there. You may >> want to bring make-aux-files.sh and aux-files-data.sh back across to >> that branch as well, and the relevant Makefile snippets that trigger the >> bootscripts tarball build. >> >> Going back to the ifup/ifdown thing, feel free to commit those back to >> the systemd branch as well. >> >> As for the ifupdown@.service unit, have distros standardized on that? >> I'd prefer to call it something like ifctl@.service, if possible. It >> just feels more correct to say: >> >> systemd disable ifctl@eth0 >> >> Saying 'systemd disable ifupdown@eth0' seems confusing as you've got the >> word up alongside the words disable and down. In addition, you've got >> both 'disable' and 'down' there, duplicating the action to take. >> >> That said, I'd prefer consistency with existing distros direction on >> this than getting correct according to my taste. >> >> Regards, >> >> Matt. >> >> > > Debian package for low level network management is called ifupdown and > they use it. We can use ifup@whatever if needed ... Hell, you can call > it whatever you like. >
Also, I just merged expat into systemd branch, but there is no commit message. I am subscribed to lfs-book. What am I doing wrong? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
