On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 05:43:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> This worked for me. I deleted bison, lex, and flex from /usr/bin and
> then built flex:
>
> sed -i -e '/test-bison/d' tests/Makefile.in
> ./configure --prefix=/usr \
> --docdir=/usr/share/doc/flex-2.5.37
> make
> make
Armin K. wrote:
> On 16.8.2013 0:09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I went into chroot where flex has already been built and all tests are
>> OK. Looking at the Makefile, I don't see an easy way to disable the
>> test. Perhaps it just needs a note saying that the test fails because
>> flex is not yet ava
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> bison. 1 failure.
>>> CXX examples/calc++/examples_calc___calc__-calc++-scanner.o
>>> g++: error: ./examples/calc++/calc++-scanner.cc: No such file or
>>> directory
>>> g++: fatal
On 16.8.2013 0:09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> bison. 1 failure.
>>> CXX examples/calc++/examples_calc___calc__-calc++-scanner.o
>>> g++: error: ./examples/calc++/calc++-scanner.cc: No such file or directory
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> bison. 1 failure.
>> CXX examples/calc++/examples_calc___calc__-calc++-scanner.o
>> g++: error: ./examples/calc++/calc++-scanner.cc: No such file or directory
>> g++: fatal error: no input files
>> compil
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 04:00:01PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> >> bison. 1 failure.
> >> CXX examples/calc++/examples_calc___calc__-calc++-scanner.o
> >> g++: error: ./examples/calc++/calc++-scanner.cc: No such file or directory
> >> g++: fatal error: no input files
>
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I'd like to do a package freeze today in preparation for LFS-7.4.
>>
>> Right now I'm not sure whether to to generate a rc1 or not. There are
>> several tests that fail that w
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'd like to do a package freeze today in preparation for LFS-7.4.
>
> Right now I'm not sure whether to to generate a rc1 or not. There are
> several tests that fail that we may want to 1) Note, 2) Patch, or 3
I'd like to do a package freeze today in preparation for LFS-7.4.
Right now I'm not sure whether to to generate a rc1 or not. There are
several tests that fail that we may want to 1) Note, 2) Patch, or 3)
Ignore. Below is my analysis of the current svn:
Coreutils. 1 failure. tes
On 2012-08-22 02:13, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Thanks - I'll fix it after I've committed the sed changes. I'm
> afraid I have a tradition of reading what I _want_ to read instead
> of that I've written.
>
> ĸen
> --
> das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
Don't we all though? XD
--
J
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:44:15AM +0100, Jasmine Iwanek wrote:
> On 2012-08-22 01:22, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I'm adding the extra locales. Then I'll add the patch for sed.
> >
> > ĸen
> > --
> > das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
>
> You might wanna check your patch ken, the out
onsive, but the problem
>> ceased as soon as I powered the desktop down - looks like a separate
>> bug, but perhaps not easy to provoke) so I'll fire up the other
>> desktop to use firefox now that I think using my KVM won't cause me
>> pain.
>>
> I'
On 2012-08-22 01:22, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm adding the extra locales. Then I'll add the patch for sed.
>
> ĸen
> --
> das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
You might wanna check your patch ken, the output for atleast
en_GB.UTF-8 is currently set to en_US.UTF-8
--
Jasmine Iwanek
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:48:33AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:11:14PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >
> > We are talking about different packages. The four you mention in sed
> > looking for LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 and one place in grep:
> >
> > 093-grep:unibyte-bracket-expr:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:11:14PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > But I don't understand the reference to KOI8 - I've got it
> > installed, but it won't be used in a utf8 test.
>
> We are talking about different packages. The four you mention in sed
> looking for LANG=ru_
Ken Moffat wrote:
> But I don't understand the reference to KOI8 - I've got it
> installed, but it won't be used in a utf8 test.
We are talking about different packages. The four you mention in sed
looking for LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 and one place in grep:
093-grep:unibyte-bracket-expr: skipped tes
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:14:47PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:13:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> I am proposing that we freeze LFS for 7.2 with the packages we now have
> >> in svn.
>
> > I'd like to get tzdata separated - I was holding fire on
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:13:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I am proposing that we freeze LFS for 7.2 with the packages we now have
>> in svn.
> I'd like to get tzdata separated - I was holding fire on that until
> I heard feedback to your suggestion of just creating a dire
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:13:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I am proposing that we freeze LFS for 7.2 with the packages we now have
> in svn. There is one outstanding ticket to address glibc issues, but
> that does not require a package change.
>
> Util-linux may come out with a new release
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/21/12 12:13 CST:
> I am proposing that we freeze LFS for 7.2 with the packages we now have
> in svn. There is one outstanding ticket to address glibc issues, but
> that does not require a package change.
>
> Util-linux may come out with a new release in the n
On 8/21/2012 10:13 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I am proposing that we freeze LFS for 7.2 with the packages we now have
> in svn. There is one outstanding ticket to address glibc issues, but
> that does not require a package change.
>
> Util-linux may come out with a new release in the next week or so
On 08/21/2012 07:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I am proposing that we freeze LFS for 7.2 with the packages we now have
> in svn. There is one outstanding ticket to address glibc issues, but
> that does not require a package change.
>
> Util-linux may come out with a new release in the next week or s
I am proposing that we freeze LFS for 7.2 with the packages we now have
in svn. There is one outstanding ticket to address glibc issues, but
that does not require a package change.
Util-linux may come out with a new release in the next week or so, but I
think we can hold off on that until afte
Baho Utot wrote:
> On 07/23/2012 11:27 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I think we should cancel the proposed BLFS package freeze. In the last
>> six weeks there were 157 entries in the change log. There are currently
>> 36 open tickets for additional changes.
>>
>> The
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:50:35 -0500, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now all the tickets for packages and instructions have been fixed.
> Any
> new packages should be targeted to 7.0 from now on. If there is a strong
> security issue, we will address that, but normal updates should
Right now all the tickets for packages and instructions have been fixed. Any
new packages should be targeted to 7.0 from now on. If there is a strong
security issue, we will address that, but normal updates should not go into 6.4.
There are three open tickets for 6.4. One is a bootscript issu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Robert Connolly wrote:
> On Sunday October 19 2008 12:05:24 am Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> I can't seem to find the original texinfo-4.13 package anywhere... :-(
>>
>> Oh well.
>
> This is the original, from September 19th:
> ftp://ftp.freefriends.o
On Sunday October 19 2008 12:05:24 am Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> I wish I *could* check the differences; I'm curious what they changed.
> I can't seem to find the original texinfo-4.13 package anywhere... :-(
>
> Oh well.
This is the original, from September 19th:
ftp://ftp.freefriends.org/texinfo/hi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Robert Connolly wrote:
> On Saturday October 18 2008 10:10:57 pm Bryan Kadzban wrote:
2247 Texinfo 4.13a ( repackage due to maintainer error )
>> I just pulled down texinfo-4.13a.tar.gz and texinfo-4.13.tar.gz --
>> and their md5sums ar
On Saturday October 18 2008 10:54:01 pm Robert Connolly wrote:
> On Saturday October 18 2008 10:10:57 pm Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> > >> 2247 Texinfo 4.13a ( repackage due to maintainer error )
> >
> > I just pulled down texinfo-4.13a.tar.gz and texinfo-4.13.tar.gz -- and
> > their md5sums are *ide
On Saturday October 18 2008 10:10:57 pm Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> >> 2247 Texinfo 4.13a ( repackage due to maintainer error )
>
> I just pulled down texinfo-4.13a.tar.gz and texinfo-4.13.tar.gz -- and
> their md5sums are *identical*. Extracting each into its own directory
> also shows no differ
d to address before a package freeze. We
>> need
>> to either agree to update or reset the target milestone to either 7.0 or
>> future.
>>
>> 2226 Vim mandir patch ( really just an optimization )
Slight preference for an option to make ("make MANDIR=/u
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Right now there are a few of tickets outstanding with regard to updated
> packages
> or patches to packages that we need to address before a package freeze. We
> need
> to either agree to update or reset the target milestone to either 7.0 or
> fut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Right now there are a few of tickets outstanding with regard to updated
> packages
> or patches to packages that we need to address before a package freeze. We
> need
> to either agree to update or r
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Right now there are a few of tickets outstanding with regard to updated
>> packages
>> or patches to packages that we need to address before a package freeze. We
>> need
>> to either agree to update or reset the
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Right now there are a few of tickets outstanding with regard to updated
> packages
> or patches to packages that we need to address before a package freeze. We
> need
> to either agree to update or reset the target milestone to either 7.0 or
> fut
Right now there are a few of tickets outstanding with regard to updated
packages
or patches to packages that we need to address before a package freeze. We
need
to either agree to update or reset the target milestone to either 7.0 or future.
2226Vim mandir patch ( really just an
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Just a heads up.
>
> I will be going through BZ again tonight and re-examining the
> outstanding bugs for the 6.1 release. When that is done, I anticipate a
> package/bug freeze sometime tomorrow. After that, the only non-targeted
> changes should be P1 (security) bugs. W
38 matches
Mail list logo
