On 8/13/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll be interested in what you find out doing the build you are doing
> right now.
>
The option --enable-dynamic passes the option -static to libtool when
linking. This makes the executables installed by openldap link
statically against
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 08/13/05 15:28 CST:
> I use --enable-dynamic in my builds too. I think it is only used for
> the slapd backends. i.e. whether to link them in dynamic or static. I
> am running a build without the dynamic. Lets see what the difference
> is.
My understanding (f
On 8/13/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not sure if you saw my previous post about the --enable-dynamic
> parameter. Any thoughts?
>
I use --enable-dynamic in my builds too. I think it is only used for
the slapd backends. i.e. whether to link them in dynamic or static. I
am run
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 08/13/05 15:04 CST:
> Another question, what is the version name that is used. For stable
> releases, instead of using naming it 2.2.26, they use stable-20050429.
> IMO we should use their terminology. Two reasons:
> (1) We are not at odds with the versioning
On 8/12/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMO, we shole stay with the "release that has demonstrated itself as
> being reliable in real world environments."
>
> 2.2.6.
>
Minor typo, that's 2.2.26.
Another question, what is the version name that is used. For stable
releases, instead o
