On 8/12/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMO, we shole stay with the "release that has demonstrated itself as > being reliable in real world environments." > > 2.2.6. >
Minor typo, that's 2.2.26. Another question, what is the version name that is used. For stable releases, instead of using naming it 2.2.26, they use stable-20050429. IMO we should use their terminology. Two reasons: (1) We are not at odds with the versioning scheme they use. (2) No one will report the General Releases as version increments. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
