Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-12-01 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess wrote: Yep, I noticed that. I'll let Jeremy sort that out, if he thinks it is worth tackling, if you don't mind Jeremy? No problem. I'll get to it shortly. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-12-01 Thread Matthew Burgess
Greg Schafer wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: Is there any particular reason you made the symlink as opposed to just doing a `sed -i -e 's@/bin/rm@/tools&@ lib/blkid/test_probe.in`? That'd probably work.. and is cleaner too. Best to avoid those pesky symlinks if at all possible.. OK, I'll appl

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Greg Schafer wrote: Sidenote: I recently got rid of the /bin/stty symlink by modifying the Expect installation: http://www.diy-linux.org/reference-build/temptools.html#tt-expect Inspired by my recent commit? :) Yours is better, though, I will admit, since it actually removes the need for any

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Greg Schafer
Matthew Burgess wrote: > Is there any particular reason you made the symlink as opposed to just > doing a `sed -i -e 's@/bin/rm@/tools&@ lib/blkid/test_probe.in`? That'd probably work.. and is cleaner too. Best to avoid those pesky symlinks if at all possible.. Sidenote: I recently got rid of t

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Matthew Burgess
Greg Schafer wrote: The /bin/rm issue is only indirectly related. After the moving of e2fsprogs, just look at the e2fsprogs testsuite build log and you'll see why the /bin/rm symlink is needed. Is there any particular reason you made the symlink as opposed to just doing a `sed -i -e 's@/bin/r

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Greg Schafer wrote: > This "must-use-trac" attitude from the LFS project is abhorrent IMHO. Most > open source projects are just happy to receive any feedback whatsoever. Not must-use, but requested politely to avoid double work. If you notice the problem, you are in the best position to explain

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Matthew Burgess
Greg Schafer wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: Oh dear. Sorry about that folks. As Bruce points out though, Trac's much better at remembering bugs than I am! This "must-use-trac" attitude from the LFS project is abhorrent IMHO. Most open source projects are just happy to receive any feedback wh

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Greg Schafer
Matthew Burgess wrote: > Oh dear. Sorry about that folks. As Bruce points out though, Trac's > much better at remembering bugs than I am! This "must-use-trac" attitude from the LFS project is abhorrent IMHO. Most open source projects are just happy to receive any feedback whatsoever. Whatever

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Matthew Burgess
Greg Schafer wrote: Already reported... sadly, no action. http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2006-October/058411.html Oh dear. Sorry about that folks. As Bruce points out though, Trac's much better at remembering bugs than I am! I think the easiest solution here is to move sed

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Greg Schafer wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > >> On a system based on very recent LFS development (last week or so...) I >> see this: >> >> # grep /tools /usr/bin/* -R >> /usr/bin/mk_cmds:SED=/tools/bin/sed >> >> This is because e2fsprogs is built before our final sed. > > Already reported... sa

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Greg Schafer
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On a system based on very recent LFS development (last week or so...) I > see this: > > # grep /tools /usr/bin/* -R > /usr/bin/mk_cmds:SED=/tools/bin/sed > > This is because e2fsprogs is built before our final sed. Already reported... sadly, no action. http://linuxfrom

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/30/06, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: El Jueves, 30 de Noviembre de 2006 17:11, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > Or are there any other ideas? Maybe to install Sed before E2fsprogs like is done in CLFS? I can't recall, but there might be an issue with moving sed up like that. But I

Re: Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 30 de Noviembre de 2006 17:11, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > Or are there any other ideas? Maybe to install Sed before E2fsprogs like is done in CLFS? -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.or

Minor build order breakage

2006-11-30 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Hello All, On a system based on very recent LFS development (last week or so...) I see this: # grep /tools /usr/bin/* -R /usr/bin/mk_cmds:SED=/tools/bin/sed This is because e2fsprogs is built before our final sed. (The book even mentions in the Appendix that sed must be built before e2fsprogs.)