On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 06:43:56PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:34:06PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >>
> >> The real question is why does your make wants to build html files? I
> >> have no reference to them at all.
>
> > Thanks. On the host (tex
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:34:06PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> The real question is why does your make wants to build html files? I
>> have no reference to them at all.
> Thanks. On the host (texinfo-4.13) it doesn't seem to reference
> them. I'll compare the logs.
'm
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:34:06PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> The real question is why does your make wants to build html files? I
> have no reference to them at all.
>
>-- Bruce
Thanks. On the host (texinfo-4.13) it doesn't seem to reference
them. I'll compare the logs.
ĸen
--
das
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Did I miss a fix for inetutils ?
No, but I don't have any problems. I just did a fresh jhalfs build and
the log has:
Build:
Making all in doc
make[3]: Entering directory `/sources/inetutils-1.9.1/doc'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/sou
Did I miss a fix for inetutils ? Apparently it installs fine for
everyone who has used it, but I'm seeing this during 'make install':
make: Entering directory `/building/inetutils-1.9.1/doc'
rm -rf inetutils.htp
if /bin/sh /building/inetutils-1.9.1/build-aux/missing --run
makeinfo --html -I .
