Ken Moffat wrote: > Did I miss a fix for inetutils ? No, but I don't have any problems. I just did a fresh jhalfs build and the log has:
Build: Making all in doc make[3]: Entering directory `/sources/inetutils-1.9.1/doc' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/inetutils-1.9.1/doc' Install: Making install in doc make[3]: Entering directory `/sources/inetutils-1.9.1/doc' make[4]: Entering directory `/sources/inetutils-1.9.1/doc' make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. test -z "/usr/share/info" || /bin/mkdir -p "/usr/share/info" /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./inetutils.info '/usr/share/info' install-info --info-dir='/usr/share/info' '/usr/share/info/inetutils.info' make[4]: Leaving directory `/sources/inetutils-1.9.1/doc' make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/inetutils-1.9.1/doc' Apparently it installs fine for > everyone who has used it, but I'm seeing this during 'make install': > > make: Entering directory `/building/inetutils-1.9.1/doc' > rm -rf inetutils.htp > if /bin/sh /building/inetutils-1.9.1/build-aux/missing --run > makeinfo --html -I . \ > -o inetutils.htp inetutils.texi; \ > then \ > rm -rf inetutils.html; \ > if test ! -d inetutils.htp && test -d inetutils; then \ > mv inetutils inetutils.html; else mv inetutils.htp > inetutils.html; fi; \ > else \ > if test ! -d inetutils.htp && test -d inetutils; then \ > rm -rf inetutils; else rm -Rf inetutils.htp inetutils.html; fi; > \ > exit 1; \ > fi > inetutils.texi:459: @itemx must follow @item > inetutils.texi:663: command @bullet not accepting argument in brace > should not be on @table line > inetutils.texi:664: warning: @item missing argument > inetutils.texi:669: warning: @item missing argument > inetutils.texi:675: warning: @item missing argument > inetutils.texi:866: @itemx must follow @item > inetutils.texi:1703: warning: node next `rlogin invocation' in menu > `rexec invocation' and in sectioning `rcp invocation' differ > inetutils.texi:1822: warning: node next `rcp invocation' in menu > `talk invocation' and in sectioning `rexec invocation' differ > inetutils.texi:1822: warning: node prev `rcp invocation' in menu > `rexec invocation' and in sectioning `rlogin invocation' differ > inetutils.texi:1889: warning: node next `rexec invocation' in menu > `rcp invocation' and in sectioning `talk invocation' differ > inetutils.texi:1889: warning: node prev `rexec invocation' in menu > `rlogin invocation' and in sectioning `rcp invocation' differ > inetutils.texi:1925: warning: node prev `talk invocation' in menu > `rcp invocation' and in sectioning `rexec invocation' differ > make: *** [inetutils.html] Error 1 > > I suppose it's the first two messages that are fatal, but how come > you guys aren't getting them ? The real question is why does your make wants to build html files? I have no reference to them at all. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
