Re: [lfs-dev] systemd - another failed attempt.

2012-06-02 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:37:35AM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, the *order* of the options is significant. > > That's surprising; normally order is not... > That's why I mentioned it. > > Adding those four after my previous options > > --with-dbussyste

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd - another failed attempt.

2012-06-02 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:46:57AM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: >> I spent a couple of hours banging my head against the dbus >> dependency before I gave up. It turned out it was easier to live >> without systemd. Bryan wrote about the dbus issue earlier >> http://linuxfromscrat

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd - another failed attempt.

2012-06-02 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:46:57AM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: > > I spent a couple of hours banging my head against the dbus dependency > before I gave up. It turned out it was easier to live without systemd. > Bryan wrote about the dbus issue earlier > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-d

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd - another failed attempt.

2012-06-01 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:34:51 +0100 Ken Moffat wrote: > 2. but then make dies at > CC src/shared/libsystemd_units_la-install.lo > In file included from src/shared/path-lookup.h:33:0, > from src/shared/install.c:33: > ./src/core/manager.h:28:23: fatal error: dbus/dbus.h: No

[lfs-dev] systemd - another failed attempt.

2012-06-01 Thread Ken Moffat
I've been trying to get this thing working using the attached patch. Basically, it's some things already in upstream, plus Andy's response to Dan's second "get-us-started" patch, with Bruce's additions to configure.ac applied by hand because it wasn't an incremental diff. Originally, I was using