On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:37:35AM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, the *order* of the options is significant. > > That's surprising; normally order is not... > That's why I mentioned it.
> > Adding those four after my previous options > > --with-dbussystemservicedir was dislkied. When I removed that, > > --enable-udev-only=yes was no longer accepted. > > Any particular error message from configure? > Only the normal message that an option was not recognised (in each of the above cases). > I have to admit I'm not sure what the most recent patch being tested is, > so I'm not entirely sure what might be happening here. Maybe the AS_IF > stuff (testing $enable_udev_only) in configure.ac is dropping the flags > for some reason? > The patch I attached at the start of this thread - a mix of what is in upstream plus contributions from Andy and Bruce, perhaps mismerged. Probably not worth spending time on in the light of what you say below. > > I'll wait for Bryan to test his proposed patch. > > Done last night, and posted to linux-hotplug (no response so far, but it > was late, and this is a weekend, and nobody's working at RH at the > moment, so that's not surprising). > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=133862040203388&w=2 > > Note that the patch as posted there is *not* suitable for LFS. [ snipped the HOWTO details ] I'm on my other machine for now, but I'll try to test all that in the next few days (I'm catching up with other things at the moment). Cheers. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page