William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> When I was looking at fedora, I noticed that they use another
>> configure switch: --enable-obsolete-rpc. Adding that installs the
>> rpc and rpcsvc headers (as well as the rpcsvc pascal .x files which
>> glibc us
On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> When I was looking at fedora, I noticed that they use another
> configure switch: --enable-obsolete-rpc. Adding that installs the
> rpc and rpcsvc headers (as well as the rpcsvc pascal .x files which
> glibc used to install [ I looked at 2.12.2
On 08/20/2012 06:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> When I was looking at fedora, I noticed that they use another
> configure switch: --enable-obsolete-rpc. Adding that installs the
> rpc and rpcsvc headers (as well as the rpcsvc pascal .x files which
> glibc used to install [ I looked at 2.12.2 ].
>
>
When I was looking at fedora, I noticed that they use another
configure switch: --enable-obsolete-rpc. Adding that installs the
rpc and rpcsvc headers (as well as the rpcsvc pascal .x files which
glibc used to install [ I looked at 2.12.2 ].
Does that seem a worthwhile change to make ? (not tes