Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If in chapter 5, some package's configure uses pkg-config to find
> libraries and include files, it finds pkg-config on the host (when
> installed), and so it finds libraries and include files on the host,
> thus bypassing our careful insulation of the tool chain fr
Hi,
If in chapter 5, some package's configure uses pkg-config to find
libraries and include files, it finds pkg-config on the host (when
installed), and so it finds libraries and include files on the host,
thus bypassing our careful insulation of the tool chain from the host.
Right now, among
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:59:27AM +0200, Armin K. wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 02:44 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Just had an intersting issue testing this for BLFS: as a user,
> > make DESTDIR install fails, unable to update the aclocal dir. Seems
> > to do the right thing (i.e. update the DESTDIR) wh
On 06/04/2012 02:44 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Just had an intersting issue testing this for BLFS: as a user,
> make DESTDIR install fails, unable to update the aclocal dir. Seems
> to do the right thing (i.e. update the DESTDIR) when run as root,
> but people using package management might need t
Just had an intersting issue testing this for BLFS: as a user,
make DESTDIR install fails, unable to update the aclocal dir. Seems
to do the right thing (i.e. update the DESTDIR) when run as root,
but people using package management might need to know this.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, da
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:39:59 +0100 Bruce Dubbs
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The current version, Dan's version, and the 'lite' verion all
>>> fail the same test for me.
>> I get the same test failure with both pkg-config-0.26 and
>> pkg-config-lite-0.26-1. With b
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:15:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Dan's version also passes all checks with --with-installed-popt. There
>> is a note in BLFS that says popt-1.16 will create a failure in
>> pkg-config's make. I didn't find that in Dan's version.
>>
>> I'm going
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:15:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Dan's version also passes all checks with --with-installed-popt. There
> is a note in BLFS that says popt-1.16 will create a failure in
> pkg-config's make. I didn't find that in Dan's version.
>
> I'm going to start working on
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:39:59 +0100
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> The current version, Dan's version, and the 'lite' verion all fail the
>> same test for me.
>
> I get the same test failure with both pkg-config-0.26 and
> pkg-config-lite-0.26-1. With both of them I can make al
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:39:59 +0100
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> The current version, Dan's version, and the 'lite' verion all fail the
>> same test for me.
>
> I get the same test failure with both pkg-config-0.26 and
> pkg-config-lite-0.26-1. With both of them I can make al
Andrew Benton wrote:
>> -
>>
>> Reading the pkg-config mailing list, I don't get any feel for when the
>> next freedesktop version will be released, but am inclined to add Dan's
>> version now and then update later when a suitable freedesktop version is
>> released. The last freede
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:39:59 +0100
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The current version, Dan's version, and the 'lite' verion all fail the
> same test for me.
I get the same test failure with both pkg-config-0.26 and
pkg-config-lite-0.26-1. With both of them I can make all tests pass if
I configure them --
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:39:59 +0100
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I am of the opinion that we should re-introduce pkg-config into LFS. I
> think it would make things simplier for both LFS and BLFS.
>
> pkg-config would make building kmod, libpipeline, man-db, and
> udev/systemd all easier in LFS.
>
>
I am of the opinion that we should re-introduce pkg-config into LFS. I
think it would make things simplier for both LFS and BLFS.
pkg-config would make building kmod, libpipeline, man-db, and
udev/systemd all easier in LFS.
In addition, there are numerous packages in BLFS that mention pkg-conf
On 03/10/12 05:23, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Lemon Lime wrote:
>
>> Seeing that some packages in LFS require pkg-config to build,
>
> Nothing *requires* pkg-config. It can always be worked around with the
> appropriate environment variables. After all, that's what it does: set
> appropriate environmen
Lemon Lime wrote:
> Seeing that some packages in LFS require pkg-config to build,
Nothing *requires* pkg-config. It can always be worked around with the
appropriate environment variables. After all, that's what it does: set
appropriate environment variables.
The reason we dropped pkg-config
Hello...
Seeing that some packages in LFS require pkg-config to build, I wrote a
bash script that implements most of pkg-config's functionality, in order
to avoid setting the flags manually for each package that needs it. I
put it in /tools/bin and did a full build of LFS, with a few packages
fro
Hello,
an email from Bruce to BLFS Support set me thinking about the how to
get pkg-config back into LFS. Obviously puting glib et al back in LFS
is a non starter and I quite like the idea of pkg-config using the glib
functions, it makes sense to use shared libraries where we can. So that
led me t
18 matches
Mail list logo
