Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Andrew Benton wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:39:59 +0100 Bruce Dubbs >> <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The current version, Dan's version, and the 'lite' verion all >>> fail the same test for me. >> I get the same test failure with both pkg-config-0.26 and >> pkg-config-lite-0.26-1. With both of them I can make all tests pass >> if I configure them --with-installed-popt > > That would make popt another dependent installtion, but I don't think > that's a deal breaker like an external glib. > > I note that we don't have popt as an optional dependency for > pkg-config in BLFS.
This whole popt / pkg-config discussion is ringing bells for me. Wasn't this something we figured out last time we were looking into the pkg-config testsuite? There was a bug in the popt version that pkg-config included, I thought. Let me see if I can find the lfs-dev thread... Yeah: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2011-September/065066.html :-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
