> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:11:50 +0100
> From: Pierre Labastie
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
.
.
>
> But useless!!!
>
Thanks for the reminder and re-pointing to .la ;]
Le 02/03/2014 02:35, akhiezer a écrit :
>> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:17:42 -0600
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>>
>> akhiezer wrote:
>>>> Date: Sat, 0
> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:17:42 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
> akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 17:04:38 -0600
> >> From: Bruce Dubbs
akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 17:04:38 -0600
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>>
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Le 01/03/2014 23:31, Bruce Dubbs a éc
> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 17:04:38 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
> > Le 01/03/2014 23:31, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> >> Pierre Labastie wrote:
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 01/03/2014 23:31, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Le 01/03/2014 21:14, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> It sounds like we need to add a check for libgmp on the host. Perhaps
>> libmpfr and libmpc also.
> It i
Le 01/03/2014 23:46, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> Le 01/03/2014 23:31, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Le 01/03/2014 21:14, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> It sounds like we need to add a check for libgmp on the host. Perhaps
>> libmpfr and libm
Le 01/03/2014 23:31, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> Le 01/03/2014 21:14, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>>
> It sounds like we need to add a check for libgmp on the host. Perhaps
> libmpfr and libmpc also.
>>>
It is the .la files, which fire the i
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 01/03/2014 21:14, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>
It sounds like we need to add a check for libgmp on the host. Perhaps
libmpfr and libmpc also.
>>
>>> It is the .la files, which fire the issue. I could reproduce the error with
>>> lfs-7.5-r
Le 01/03/2014 21:14, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
>>> It sounds like we need to add a check for libgmp on the host. Perhaps
>>> libmpfr and libmpc also.
>
>> It is the .la files, which fire the issue. I could reproduce the error with
>> lfs-7.5-rc1 as the host, by removing li
Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> It sounds like we need to add a check for libgmp on the host. Perhaps
>> libmpfr and libmpc also.
> It is the .la files, which fire the issue. I could reproduce the error with
> lfs-7.5-rc1 as the host, by removing libgmp.la.
>
> Actually, neither Debian nor Arch provid
Le 01/03/2014 18:50, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
>> So, I eventually managed to install slackware (only packages for passing the
>> host reqs, running jhalfs, and running the slackware package management
>> system. The key point (I think) is that I haven't installed the packag
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> So, I eventually managed to install slackware (only packages for passing the
> host reqs, running jhalfs, and running the slackware package management
> system. The key point (I think) is that I haven't installed the package
> "gmp-5.0.5-x86_64-1", and that it does not pre
Le 27/02/2014 21:49, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
>
>
> Oops, sorry for bad wording. Of course, you can install gcc without the other
> libraries, but the compiler cannot compile anything: the compilation stage
> (cc1) cannot run without all three libraries. Hum, cc1 is installed in
> /usr/libexec/i4
Le 27/02/2014 20:26, akhiezer a écrit :
>> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:28:29 +0100
>> From: Pierre Labastie
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>>
> .
> .
>>>
>> T
> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:28:29 +0100
> From: Pierre Labastie
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
.
.
> >
> There is something I cannot understand, which is "if libgmp is not
&
Le 27/02/2014 10:02, akhiezer a écrit :
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:28:48 -0600
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>>
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Le 26/02/
akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:28:48 -0600
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>>
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Le 26/02/2014 22:47, Bruce D
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:28:48 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
> > Le 26/02/2014 22:47, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> >> [ ! -e /usr/lib/libgmp
On Feb 26, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Maybe
>
> if [ $(find /usr/lib -name libmpc.so\* | wc -l) == 0 ]; then
> echo "libmpc libraries are not installed"
> fi
>
> -- Bruce
I tried to replicate this issue and I couldn't.
I did a full slackware install and had no issue.
I hope thi
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 26/02/2014 22:47, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> [ ! -e /usr/lib/libgmp.so ] && echo "/usr/lib/libgmp.so missing"
> Might not be so easy. On Debian we get:
> ---
> pierre@turboli:~$ [ ! -e /usr/lib/libgmp.so ] &&
> echo "/usr/lib/libgmp.so missing"
> /usr/lib/libgmp.so
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:13:53 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
.
.
>
> Am still wondering what happened ca that lfs r9493 ; a curious change,
Le 26/02/2014 22:47, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> [ ! -e /usr/lib/libgmp.so ] && echo "/usr/lib/libgmp.so missing"
Might not be so easy. On Debian we get:
---
pierre@turboli:~$ [ ! -e /usr/lib/libgmp.so ] &&
echo "/usr/lib/libgmp.so missing"
/usr/lib/libgmp.so missing
-
while:
--
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:47:18 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: akhiezer ,
> LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
.
.
>
> Yes, it makes sense, but at this stage I don't want to cha
akhiezer wrote:
>> From lfs-dev-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Feb 26 20:04:08 2014
>> Reading the message on Dec 17, it seems that the host had mpfr but not
>> gmp. I think I'd suggest just deleting or renaming libgmp.la on the
>> host. Stupid libtool.
>>
>
>
> Yes, but the main point here i
> From lfs-dev-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Feb 26 20:04:08 2014
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:00:08 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:44:19 -0600
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does gcc pass1 & pass2 in
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:44:19 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
> >>>
> >>> Does gcc pass1 & pass2 instructions need '--with-gmp...' (possi
akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:04:18 +0100
>> From: "Armin K."
>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>>
>> On 02/26/2014 07:05 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>>>
>&
> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:04:18 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc pass 1/2 instructions re mpfr/gmp/mpc.
>
> On 02/26/2014 07:05 PM, akhiezer wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
>
On 02/26/2014 07:05 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Does gcc pass1 & pass2 instructions need '--with-gmp...' (possibly also
> '--with-mpc...') configure options (re-)added, or have mpfr/gmp/mpc listed
> in the book's general host-requirements ('prologue/hostreqs.html') ?
>
>
Both gcc pass1
Hi,
Does gcc pass1 & pass2 instructions need '--with-gmp...' (possibly also
'--with-mpc...') configure options (re-)added, or have mpfr/gmp/mpc listed
in the book's general host-requirements ('prologue/hostreqs.html') ?
Reason is that it looks like if host system doesn't have either of at
leas
32 matches
Mail list logo
