Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-31 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 03:47:53PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: Sorry, this is becoming O/T for LFS itself. > Thanks for that confirmation. I don't install reiser, and I hadn't > installed raptor at that point, Don't want to return to the rc1 > system on this box at the moment (just started build

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-31 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:31:37PM -0500, William Harrington wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Igor Živković wrote: > > >The culprit is git-manpages-1.8.4. I've just noticed it on my newest > >build. I've also noticed that LFS doesn't install tar man page. :-) > > > Hmm I recently instal

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-31 Thread William Harrington
On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Igor Živković wrote: The culprit is git-manpages-1.8.4. I've just noticed it on my newest build. I've also noticed that LFS doesn't install tar man page. :-) Hmm I recently installed git-manpages 1.8.4 with my clfs-dev build from April that I keep upgrading, a

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-31 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 11:42 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I don't think tar comes with a man page. That said, I do have tar.1 and > tar.5, but I don't recall when they were installed. They are not in the > man-pages tarball. Tar don't provide a man page upstream because the preferred GNU docume

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-31 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Igor Živković wrote: > On 08/31/2013 05:32 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Ken Moffat wrote: >>> >>> I'll wait to see if the instrumentation is working, then take a >>> look at an i686 build to narrow this down. Or perhaps another build >>> on this faster machine, but in a directory : I don't need t

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-31 Thread Igor Živković
On 08/31/2013 05:32 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> >>I'll wait to see if the instrumentation is working, then take a >> look at an i686 build to narrow this down. Or perhaps another build >> on this faster machine, but in a directory : I don't need to boot >> it, just to look at

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-31 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:20:29PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Ken Moffat wrote: >>> >>> (which I build straight after xorg). It's gitk, but 'man git' (or >>> man anything) didn't work for a regular user - instead it listed the >>> manpage it couldn't open. Something in my bu

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-31 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:20:29PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > (which I build straight after xorg). It's gitk, but 'man git' (or > > man anything) didn't work for a regular user - instead it listed the > > manpage it couldn't open. Something in my build had set > > /usr/

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > > I'm just rebuilding my current desktop on -rc2. Got to the end of > my xorg script and couldn't remember which git command uses tcl > (which I build straight after xorg). It's gitk, but 'man git' (or > man anything) didn't work for a regular user - instead it listed the >

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-30 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 30-08-2013 22:24, Ken Moffat escreveu: > > I'm just rebuilding my current desktop on -rc2. Got to the end of > my xorg script and couldn't remember which git command uses tcl > (which I build straight after xorg). It's gitk, but 'man git' (or > man anything) didn't work for a regular user -

[lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-30 Thread Ken Moffat
I'm just rebuilding my current desktop on -rc2. Got to the end of my xorg script and couldn't remember which git command uses tcl (which I build straight after xorg). It's gitk, but 'man git' (or man anything) didn't work for a regular user - instead it listed the manpage it couldn't open. Som