On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 19:33 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> The failure with 0.2.0 was a problem from my manual install
> (couldn't mount my scripts over nfs, built it from memory and let it
> install into /usr whereas my scripts move rpcbind to /sbin). So
> every time I ran /sbin/rpcbind I was runni
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:41:43PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:32:33AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >
> > It's hard for me to believe that we are the first ones seeing that.
> > I'll take a look at it on my system to see if there is something
> > different. Probably lat
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:32:33AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >> Successful build and boot [1] on x86_64. Differences between the
> >> first and second builds were Matt's patches for automake and
> >> texinfo, a
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> Successful build and boot [1] on x86_64. Differences between the
>> first and second builds were Matt's patches for automake and
>> texinfo, and now 3.10.9 headers. No new test failures.
>>
>> 1. I used rpcbind-0
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Successful build and boot [1] on x86_64. Differences between the
> first and second builds were Matt's patches for automake and
> texinfo, and now 3.10.9 headers. No new test failures.
>
> 1. I used rpcbind-0.2.1 in the new build, th
Successful build and boot [1] on x86_64. Differences between the
first and second builds were Matt's patches for automake and
texinfo, and now 3.10.9 headers. No new test failures.
1. I used rpcbind-0.2.1 in the new build, that is not working. I've
now got a patch to make strace build again, s
