On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:41:43PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:32:33AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > It's hard for me to believe that we are the first ones seeing that. > > I'll take a look at it on my system to see if there is something > > different. Probably later this afternoon. > > > Headers seem identical. Might be a kernel issue - original build > is running 3.11.0-rc6, the second build is running 3.10.9. Will > take some time while I build a range of kernels (avoiding 3.10.8 of > course). > The failure with 0.2.0 was a problem from my manual install (couldn't mount my scripts over nfs, built it from memory and let it install into /usr whereas my scripts move rpcbind to /sbin). So every time I ran /sbin/rpcbind I was running 0.2.1. I've now fixed the install and 0.2.0 is working on the new build.
So, not an LFS problem. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
