So, what's up with the linux kernel and overlayed filesystems? There's no
support.
I notice the Arch CD initramfs creates RAM disks for volatile directories
and copy the contents into from archives into them. That's no where near
as elegant or flexible.
On 21 March 2013 10:20,
On 21 March 2013 10:01, William Harrington wrote:
As far as it recreating ssh keys, I don't think you'd want to publish a
> livecd and distribute it and then everyone on the planet using the same ssh
> key if they have it open to the public vie their network connection. I
> don't know if that wou
On 18 March 2013 14:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I agree, but at least that is a good baseline that checks the host
> requirements that are currently published.
Focusing on the more modern, I hadn't considered that priority for the
development of the book. The Host System Requirements and version
I'd be interested to take a look at your work.
I've been taking my time as a lot of it is pretty new to me. There is no
escaping the fact an initrd file is needed, for the bootup on multiple
systems by taking advantage of modules, and to mount a root from CD that
can be overlaid with a ram disk.
I elected to use 'Os' optimisations on my current compilation round. I
understand it to be safe option and can only assume it help when it comes
to compressing the filesystem into an archive on a limited media choice.
But I am no expert on the subject and would appreciate suggestions.
--
http://
Sorry, my mistake. I got around it with make LDFLAGS='-lpthread', as Billy
stated in his first post.
The problem also crops up using the 64-bit version of Ubuntu 12.04 as well.
On 7 March 2013 07:38, cybertao wrote:
> I had the same issue when using 32-bit Ubuntu 12.04. I got
> Either one would be great, though I think a 7.3 stable ISO would be
> perfect.
> If a dual i686 and x86_64 is doable, then great, otherwise two ISOs for the
> two platforms shouldn't be that much harder then the combo. At least it
> seems that way to me.
Looking at how Arch do it, it shouldn't
Okay, I'm on the job. Since I've been playing with the systemd branch I
need to compile vanilla 32-bit and 64-bit releases, which I'm currently
doing using jhalfs.
I just realised I chose the development branch without much consideration,
when the stable version my be more appropriate. If only fo
I'm interested. I'd definitely need the help and guidance, but have the
time and enthusiasm.
The previous Live CD was an invaluable tool to me over the years, not just
as a platform for building LFS. Arch has replaced my need for it, but a
Live CD primed and ready to go increases the accessibilit
I had the same issue when using 32-bit Ubuntu 12.04. I got around it at
the time with:
make LDFLAGS=-lthreads
On 6 March 2013 19:21, Billy O'Connor wrote:
> Matt Burgess writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 14:05 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Billy O'Connor wrote:
> >> > I dl'd the book sourc
I've been using Arch as a reference and configuring the network by writing
a network.service script that simply executes 'ip' commands ('ip addr add
...', 'ip route ...', 'ip link set ...', etc.)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsu
bit. I'll write a log as I do
and see if I can come up with some constructive feedback.
On Feb 15, 2013 10:28 PM, "Matthew Burgess"
wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:31:05 +1300, cybertao wrote:
> > I just finished building this, ironed out my mistakes (journald barfing
>
I just finished building this, ironed out my mistakes (journald barfing
because there's no machine-id is a good one!), and couldn't be more pleased
with myself. And immensely grateful for all the work that went into this.
Thanks.
On 6 February 2013 10:34, Matt Burgess wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'v
13 matches
Mail list logo
