> Either one would be great, though I think a 7.3 stable ISO would be > perfect. > If a dual i686 and x86_64 is doable, then great, otherwise two ISOs for the > two platforms shouldn't be that much harder then the combo. At least it > seems that way to me.
Looking at how Arch do it, it shouldn't be too difficult for a combined image. They have separate i686 and x86_64 kernels and separate compressed filesystems. The bootloader allows the user to select which to load. This is a super option for a recovery CD, and anyone who needs space for a custom image can delete the architecture they don't want. But I still have to get my hands dirty and see if it's realistic.
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
