On 05/31/2013 05:49:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
> > On 06/01/2013 12:27 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> >> Is there any interest in LFS for the Pi?
>
> > From what I've heard - it's an ARM board.
>
> That's right.
>
> > LFS only supports x86/x86_64
> > and it doesn't support cross-
On 05/14/2013 01:59:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 2. Also, I did a test of setting /etc/mtab as a symlink to
> /proc/mounts
> and it seems to work properly although the output of 'mount' is a bit
> more verbose. My objection of 'mount' not specifying the device for
> the
> rootfs is fixed. I th
On 05/03/2013 09:54:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
>
> As I review the packages, it seems that the only constant is
> inconsistency. Trying to parse versions is quite package
On 04/01/2013 04:59:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I don't mind adding it to LFS. It's one of the first things I build
> because I use it in my scripts for measuring build size.
>
> An additional package to move from LFS might be lsb_release-1.4 to
> complement what we have in Section 9.1.
And I ha
On 04/01/2013 04:59:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I'd seen comments on the kernel list about bc being required in
> > 3.9, and then forgotten about them (on my desktops I have it anyway,
> > for xscreensaver). It gets used for kernel/timeconst.h
> > https://patchwork.kernel.o
On 07/08/2011 11:00 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> 2) rm "$SRCDIR"/procps-3.2.8-fix_HZ_errors-1.patch || exit 1
>
>> The path has a "//" which means -p1 winds up with an absolute path after
>> discarding one "/".
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here with the 'rm ... |exit 1', but the patch
> applies c
I'm automating LFS 6.8, and two of the patches don't apply with busybox
patch:
1) gcc-4.5.2-startfiles_fix-1.patch
Requires "fuzz" support, which I didn't implement because it tends to
mis-apply patches. (This is not the same as applying at an offset, this
is discarding context lines in order to
In the "LFS and Standards" part of the 6.8 preface, it lists the Single
Unix Specification Version 3. A couple points:
A) SUSv4 shipped in 2008.
B) SUSv4 actually comes from (and is approved by) other standards
bodies, it's also known as POSIX-2008, IEEE Std 1003.1, and The Open
Group base speci
On 06/27/2011 10:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
>> The mirrors listed at
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/packages.html#packages have
>> one-big-tarball versions of the packages and patches for all the
>> previous releases... but not this one.
&
The mirrors listed at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/packages.html#packages have
one-big-tarball versions of the packages and patches for all the
previous releases... but not this one.
Is the current tarball anywhere?
Rob
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://w
10 matches
Mail list logo
