Re: GCC 4.x

2005-06-13 Thread Matthias Berndt
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:15:05 -0700 Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt, Jeremy, and LFS-Dev, > > What are you feelings on cross-lfs moving to GCC 4.x? > > Or do you want to continue the testing with 3.4.4, then after > that's completly stablized, then move to GCC 4.x? GCC4

wc in Bootscripts

2005-04-07 Thread Matthias Berndt
Greetings, wouldn't it make sense to move 'wc' from '/usr/bin' to '/bin' like other tools in the coreutils-package to prevent some more or less cryptic constructions in '/etc/rc.d/init.d/functions'? FHS don't tell me anything against this idea

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Matthias Berndt
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:01:12 -0800 Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let us know what the errors were so we can fix them. 1. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions === line 39 === if [ -z "${COLUMNS}" ] then COLUMNS=$(stty size) COLUMNS=${COLUMNS##* } fi === This causes zsh-problems when $COLUMNS

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Matthias Berndt
Ok, I'll do so, but it may take some time. Please don't hit me! I still use some lfs-bootscripts-2* and looking at lfs-bootscripts-3* told me, that these scripts kill some problems with the ZShell. Next days i will take a closer look und check if there are still some failures. Sorry. Ma

Re: Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Matthias Berndt
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:01:12 -0800 Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'm asking because I changed /bin/sh from /bin/bash to /bin/zsh and > >made a disaster. > > Let us know what the errors were so we can fix them. Ok, I'll do so, but it may take some time. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/

Bootscripts SheBang

2005-03-30 Thread Matthias Berndt
Greetings! Wouldn't it make sense to change the SheBang in the bootscripts from '#!/bin/sh' to '#!/bin/bash' because the scripts are not bourne shell compatible? I'm asking because I changed /bin/sh from /bin/bash to /bin/zsh and made a disaster.