nd the pedantic
route, then this is an overkill. If you don't, then it is a viable
alternative with even bigger long term potential than what it seems right
now.
> --
> Alexander E. Patrakov
George Makrydakis
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Monday 03 March 2008 22:00:39 George Makrydakis wrote:
> On Monday 03 March 2008 20:57:48 Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> [snip]
> It's irrelevant to what I was saying, yes. I wasn't saying "we should
> let users read from any OS/browser/whatever" on its own. I wa
On Monday 03 March 2008 20:57:48 Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 04:07:38PM +0200, George Makrydakis wrote:
> > Cross platform code runs everywhere.
>
> Um, yeah (at least in theory), but does that actually help? See the
>
> question below that you didn
On Monday 03 March 2008 16:07:38 George Makrydakis wrote:
> Writing the same in C++ uses 10% of these features if not less and its power
shines when you do not use it as a C superset.
to :
Writing the same in C++ uses 10% of the LANGUAGE FEATURES if not less and its
power shines when you
On Monday 03 March 2008 05:03:56 Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> George Makrydakis wrote:
> > First of all, Joe Sixpack is David's term.
>
> Yeah, I know that...
>
> > Second, I did not use Windows before Linux :)
>
> I'm not talking about you.
I do know that, b
On Sunday 02 March 2008 21:33:42 Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> I think it's a really bad idea for us to specifically try to teach
> anything to Joe Sixpack that's never even used Linux. Note I'm not
> saying that everyone who uses LFS had used Linux before they started --
> but those that didn't are mos
On Sunday 02 March 2008 02:02:23 David Jensen wrote:
> George Makrydakis wrote:
> > You know what? This can work on windows as well.
>
> LOL, and joe-sixpack visits LFS and clicks install ubuntu clone now!
What is the lol about?
Since when it was impossible to compile cross - plat
On Sunday 02 March 2008 00:08:22 Thomas Trepl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 29. Februar 2008 19:45:47 schrieb George Makrydakis:
> > On Friday 29 February 2008 17:26:43 Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> > ...
> > For all readers: There are many things you do not know. Choose t
On Saturday 01 March 2008 22:51:30 Dave Wheeler wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 10:15 AM, George Makrydakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > This means that the entire design should focus on the fact that you are
> > dealing with a database by itself, not a book.
>
>
On Saturday 01 March 2008 20:21:19 David Jensen wrote:
> George Makrydakis wrote:
> > Actually, what is necessary is to have a system that deals with
> > dependency resolution outside and over any package manager involved in
> > this process, for obvious reasons. Transformi
On Saturday 01 March 2008 18:07:59 David Jensen wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:06:41 -0700
> >
> > Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What if LFS wasn't in book form anymore. What if it's an interactive
> >> program instead. A 100% merge of LFS, BLFS, ALFS, LFS
On Saturday 01 March 2008 00:55:04 David Jensen wrote:
> George Makrydakis wrote:
> > This means that there is always the benefit of the doubt. If you want
> > this settled, you know where and how to find me. If this is a
> > misunderstanding ,it is a long standing one and
On Friday 29 February 2008 23:14:19 Alan Lord wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> ... Lots of stuff about George's crazy email(s).
As if you knew what this is all about. You obviously don't.
> Jeremy,
>
> I really don't know what George is on. I didn't plan to respond to his
> mail at all. I don't
On Friday 29 February 2008 22:26:24 Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:45:47PM +0200, George Makrydakis wrote:
> > You have some issues, sir. You are doing the same thing to everybody
> > else's project you cannot touch. You did the same when you ungraci
On Friday 29 February 2008 17:26:43 Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 04:20:25PM +0200, George Makrydakis wrote:
> > I would have some heavy commenting to do on the origin of what you are
> > proposing here but in anycase, time for this will come and you know it.
>
tly
if they wish to. I would have a lot more to say, but it is neither the place,
or the time.
What is odreex? A component framework. A library set. A toolkit. A swiss army
knife.
Expect the release tomorrow at some point. Mailing lists at:
http://lists.odreex.org
Enjoy
George Makrydakis
On Friday 29 February 2008 00:38:52 Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:59:01PM +0200, George Makrydakis wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 February 2008 22:33:09 Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> > > c. I was involved in such discussions in the past and I had high hopes
&g
On Thursday 28 February 2008 23:59:01 George Makrydakis wrote:
> The pythagorian apophthegm "Not everything can be explained to everyone"
> applies to many chapters in the book(s). I will elaborate on why this
> statement can be proved wrong if specialized "streams" o
On Thursday 28 February 2008 22:33:09 Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, at 02:35 George Makrydakis wrote:
> [...]
>
> > 7) Perhaps some of the people majorly involved in this have understood
> > that it is time to stop behaving the way they did. If that is the ca
On Thursday 28 February 2008 05:10:58 Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > Unless I misunderstood Gerard's proposal, that is what he is suggesting.
>
> Yes, that's in essence what I was saying. Although I don't think it
> possible to truly merge everything LFS-related project into one single
> project.
>
> >
On Thursday 28 February 2008 03:48:47 Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> George Makrydakis wrote:
> > In what way(s) could you do this that diy-linux and clfs do not do
> > already? How is it going to compete with the other two? Or three.. Or
> > four... Or Infinity?
>
> I'
On Thursday 28 February 2008 01:06:41 Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> What if LFS wasn't in book form anymore. What if it's an interactive
> program instead. A 100% merge of LFS, BLFS, ALFS, LFS.
This requires a glue point (book, and non book - form). You will have that.
But does your LFS actually _exc
22 matches
Mail list logo
