On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:52:58AM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/15/2014 11:29 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> > On 02/15/2014 06:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> After akhiezer's thorough review of the FHS changes, I've narrowed
> >> things down to the following.
> >>
> >> The numbers refer to the version c
On 02/15/2014 11:29 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/15/2014 06:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> After akhiezer's thorough review of the FHS changes, I've narrowed
>> things down to the following.
>>
>> The numbers refer to the version control patch number, as in:
>>
>> http://bzr.linuxfoundation.org/logge
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Tomorrow I plan on creating and releasing -rc1 for LFS and BLFS.
Well I've had some unplanned events come up (non-LFS) and I will now
plan on doing -rc1 on Sunday. The rest of this evening will be jsut
checking things over.
Updating BLFS is OK for now, but please keep an e
On 02/15/2014 06:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> After akhiezer's thorough review of the FHS changes, I've narrowed
> things down to the following.
>
> The numbers refer to the version control patch number, as in:
>
> http://bzr.linuxfoundation.org/loggerhead/lsb/devel/fhs-spec/revision/
>
> The co
Em 15-02-2014 14:23, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> After akhiezer's thorough review of the FHS changes, I've narrowed
> things down to the following.
>
> The numbers refer to the version control patch number, as in:
>
> http://bzr.linuxfoundation.org/loggerhead/lsb/devel/fhs-spec/revision/
>
> The co
After akhiezer's thorough review of the FHS changes, I've narrowed
things down to the following.
The numbers refer to the version control patch number, as in:
http://bzr.linuxfoundation.org/loggerhead/lsb/devel/fhs-spec/revision/
The comment and short description follow. Then are my comments.
Gregory H. Nietsky wrote:
>
> On 02/15/14 10:01, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> These automake tests pass if the static library is present and the .so
>> files are missing. `nm libfl.so.2.0.0` gives:
>>
>> U yylex
>>
>> U means undefined. The linker crashes on that. I'll revert the change
>> to flex
On 02/15/14 10:01, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> These automake tests pass if the static library is present and the .so
> files are missing. `nm libfl.so.2.0.0` gives:
>
> U yylex
>
> U means undefined. The linker crashes on that. I'll revert the change
> to flex that creates the dynamic libraries.
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I just finished a full build with the latest svn and got five test errors:
>
> 073-glibc-2.19: [/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-ftell-partial-wide.out]
> 073-glibc-2.19: [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-robust8.out]
>
> 104-automake-1.14.1:FAIL: t/lex-depend-cxx.sh
> 104-automake-
