On 02/15/2014 11:29 PM, Armin K. wrote: > On 02/15/2014 06:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> After akhiezer's thorough review of the FHS changes, I've narrowed >> things down to the following. >> >> The numbers refer to the version control patch number, as in: >> >> http://bzr.linuxfoundation.org/loggerhead/lsb/devel/fhs-spec/revision/<number> >> >> The comment and short description follow. Then are my comments. I'm in >> the process of rebuilding again with the libexec overrides removed. I >> still need to look at grub for LFS and possible addition of some >> directories in the 'Creating Directories' section, but otherwise, things >> are looking pretty good. >> >> -- Bruce > > I'd rather not. > > 1) It's a big change for this late in the cycle and such changes have > always be known to produce some problems later on (even minor ones) > because of hurry to implement them. > > 2) It's not declared stable, and thus it contradicts with B/LFS only > shipping stable software (/run was a must rather, else software wouldn't > work without it). > 3) No distro is using it yet except Fedora, which is playground for many things that we also don't use. I see no reason to rush here.
> Being it a big change, I'd suggest postponing it for a later release > then calling such release 8.x. > > Your call. > -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
