Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-7.4-rc building itself.

2013-08-26 Thread Matt Burgess
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 19:33 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > The failure with 0.2.0 was a problem from my manual install > (couldn't mount my scripts over nfs, built it from memory and let it > install into /usr whereas my scripts move rpcbind to /sbin). So > every time I ran /sbin/rpcbind I was runni

Re: [blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-26 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:54:22AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:32:15PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 04:10:58PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > >>> > >>> I also built strace-4.8 fine against linux-3.10, but did so under > >>> uCli

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-7.4-rc building itself.

2013-08-26 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:41:43PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:32:33AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > It's hard for me to believe that we are the first ones seeing that. > > I'll take a look at it on my system to see if there is something > > different. Probably lat

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-7.4-rc building itself.

2013-08-26 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:32:33AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> Successful build and boot [1] on x86_64. Differences between the > >> first and second builds were Matt's patches for automake and > >> texinfo, a

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-7.4-rc building itself.

2013-08-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >> Successful build and boot [1] on x86_64. Differences between the >> first and second builds were Matt's patches for automake and >> texinfo, and now 3.10.9 headers. No new test failures. >> >> 1. I used rpcbind-0

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-7.4-rc building itself.

2013-08-26 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > Successful build and boot [1] on x86_64. Differences between the > first and second builds were Matt's patches for automake and > texinfo, and now 3.10.9 headers. No new test failures. > > 1. I used rpcbind-0.2.1 in the new build, th

[lfs-dev] LFS-7.4-rc building itself.

2013-08-26 Thread Ken Moffat
Successful build and boot [1] on x86_64. Differences between the first and second builds were Matt's patches for automake and texinfo, and now 3.10.9 headers. No new test failures. 1. I used rpcbind-0.2.1 in the new build, that is not working. I've now got a patch to make strace build again, s