Re: [lfs-dev] Spelling corrections...

2013-03-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Kevin Lyda wrote: > Sorry! Didn't see the release happening. Hopefully it's a step you could > add to the release process. > > I do update it based on wikipedia updating their misspelling page, so pip > install --upgrade misspellings isn't a bad idea. Can you give a reference for pip? Bruce -

Re: [lfs-dev] Spelling corrections...

2013-03-03 Thread Kevin Lyda
Sorry! Didn't see the release happening. Hopefully it's a step you could add to the release process. I do update it based on wikipedia updating their misspelling page, so pip install --upgrade misspellings isn't a bad idea. Kevin On Mar 3, 2013 11:48 PM, "Bruce Dubbs" wrote: > Kevin Lyda wrote:

Re: [lfs-dev] Spelling corrections...

2013-03-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Kevin Lyda wrote: > I generated these using my misspellings command: > > pip install misspellings > find * -type f -print0 | xargs misspellings -s fix.sh > # check that I agree with fix.sh > sh fix.sh > rm fix.sh > svn diff > > - No label in preface (actualy, skip the hardcoded dot). -->

[lfs-dev] Spelling corrections...

2013-03-03 Thread Kevin Lyda
I generated these using my misspellings command: pip install misspellings find * -type f -print0 | xargs misspellings -s fix.sh # check that I agree with fix.sh sh fix.sh rm fix.sh svn diff There were two misspellings in the Changelog but I left them. Index: stylesheets/lfs-xsl/nochunks.xsl

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10185 - in branches/systemd/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter06

2013-03-03 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 20:53 +0100, Armin K. wrote: > On 03/03/2013 08:43 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > > > > BUt now I've got to figure out why an LFS build doesn't generate/install > > that man page! > > For all man pages, libxslt and docbook-{xml,xsl} are needed. That's initially what I thought too

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10185 - in branches/systemd/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter06

2013-03-03 Thread Armin K.
On 03/03/2013 08:43 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 13:28 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I don't understand what machine-id is, but if it changes with something >> (e.g. boot), then the entry in /etc should be a symlink to /var. If's >> it's constant after creation (e.g. /etc/sshd/

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10185 - in branches/systemd/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter06

2013-03-03 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 13:28 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I don't understand what machine-id is, but if it changes with something > (e.g. boot), then the entry in /etc should be a symlink to /var. If's > it's constant after creation (e.g. /etc/sshd/ keys), then the entry in > /var should be a sy

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10185 - in branches/systemd/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter06

2013-03-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 03/03/2013 07:59 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: >> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 18:37 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >>> It seems that now "make install" has no remap at all ;-) >>> Actually, I am not sure 'dbus-uuidgen --ensure' is needed >>> because according to the documentation (man 5

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10185 - in branches/systemd/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter06

2013-03-03 Thread Armin K.
On 03/03/2013 07:59 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 18:37 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> It seems that now "make install" has no remap at all ;-) >> Actually, I am not sure 'dbus-uuidgen --ensure' is needed >> because according to the documentation (man 5 machine-id), >> the dbu

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10185 - in branches/systemd/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter06

2013-03-03 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 18:37 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > It seems that now "make install" has no remap at all ;-) > Actually, I am not sure 'dbus-uuidgen --ensure' is needed > because according to the documentation (man 5 machine-id), > the dbus machine-id file (/var:lib/dbus/machine-id) could

Re: [lfs-dev] [systemd branch] Why is XML::Parser on the same page as Perl?

2013-03-03 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 11:14 -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: > I agree completely with Pierre on this one. There really is no reason > I can think of that XML::Parser cannot have its own page for package > management simplicity. I agree with Randy, Bruce, and half-with, half-against Pierre :-) I thi

Re: [lfs-dev] Potential pollution of toolchain by the host

2013-03-03 Thread Yaacov-Yoseph Weiss
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > Not long ago, I had some problems with the building of check, which > I traced back to some problem with binutils pass2 (see > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2012-December/067444.html). > But it seemed that nobody ha

Re: [lfs-dev] Typo in LFS 7.3

2013-03-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jason Daly wrote: > While building LFS 7.3 I discovered a small error. > > 6.51. Kbd-1.15.5 > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/kbd.html > > The third sed command has an extraneous "&&" appended. Actually, we generally don't use && at all in LFS (with some exceptions). I'

Re: [lfs-dev] [systemd branch] Why is XML::Parser on the same page as Perl?

2013-03-03 Thread Randy McMurchy
Armin K. wrote these words on 03/02/13 11:28 CST: > Dana 2.3.2013 18:14, Pierre Labastie je napisao: >> I do not understand why the above has been done. >> I understand XML::Parser is a Perl module. >> But glibc (for example) is a C library, and we do not >> put it on the same page as GCC... I agr

Re: [lfs-dev] [systemd branch] post-install instructions as remap="install"

2013-03-03 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 20:29 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > There are (at least) to places in the systemd book > where post install instructions are inside a > tag. > > for dbus: > dbus-uuidgen --ensure > > for systemd: > systemd-machine-id-setup > > I suggest they are moved to a remap="config

Re: [lfs-dev] Typo in LFS 7.3

2013-03-03 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 13:37 +, Jason Daly wrote: > While building LFS 7.3 I discovered a small error. > > 6.51. Kbd-1.15.5 > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/kbd.html > > The third sed command has an extraneous "&&" appended. Thanks. Fixed in 10184. Regards, Matt.

[lfs-dev] Typo in LFS 7.3

2013-03-03 Thread Jason Daly
While building LFS 7.3 I discovered a small error. 6.51. Kbd-1.15.5 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/kbd.html The third sed command has an extraneous "&&" appended. Thank you, Jason -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratc