Re: [lfs-dev] Happy 13th

2012-12-18 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Only to with happy 13th to LFS too. It's an occasion for me to say "thanks" to this marvelous project. Thanks to all the team who maintain it, in all its components (blfs, lfs, alfs). I find this project great and I hope I'll help it. I hope we'll be able to write again in 13 years to say that lfs

[lfs-dev] Happy 13th

2012-12-18 Thread Gerard Beekmans
Hey guys, 13 years ago LFS 1.0 was released (Dec 16, 1999). Still continuing on today. Reading an old article from 3 years ago (http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10413589-16.html) sparked this email. The first sentence in that article reads "Quick, what were you doing on December 9, 1999? If

Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements

2012-12-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 17/12/2012 17:13, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >> [...] >> By far, the biggest problem is having the wrong symlink for /bin/sh. I >> recently highlighted the symlink issue in Section 5.3 of SVN. [...] > I have made a great number of builds with /bin/sh being a link to dash >

Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements

2012-12-18 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 17/12/2012 17:13, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > [...] > By far, the biggest problem is having the wrong symlink for /bin/sh. I > recently highlighted the symlink issue in Section 5.3 of SVN. [...] I have made a great number of builds with /bin/sh being a link to dash without any flaw. The two others