Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:43:21PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> Reading the Fedora messages was interesting. I went ahead and added the
>> patch. Looking at the book's change log, we've made 5 changes since
>> -rc1. The most significant were today with changes in glibc, bu
Armin K. wrote:
> Hey, thank you for adding the patch. I was unable to reproduce it with
> anything. It just happened twice with glibc 2.16.0 ... I used 2.14.1 for
> some months and it never happened there. I still don't know what causes
> it, but it's fine to have a fix!
From what I read, it is
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:43:21PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Reading the Fedora messages was interesting. I went ahead and added the
> patch. Looking at the book's change log, we've made 5 changes since
> -rc1. The most significant were today with changes in glibc, but
> standing back an
On 08/28/2012 12:43 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> The problem seems to be tricky to hit, I was going to say I didn't
>> think we should carry it. But fedora are using it:
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/glibc.git/plain/glibc-rh730856.patch?h=f18
>> (dates in the patch are fro
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:13:12PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Moving to -dev.
>>
>> I don't know what I did before, but it does apply for me now. The issue
>> here is whether we should add it to Chapter 6 right now. According the
>> the copyright notices, it hasn't changed s
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:13:12PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Moving to -dev.
>>
>>> Comment(by ken@…):
>>>
>>>Replying to [comment:5 bdubbs@…]:
>>>> Replying to [comment:4 ken@…]:
>>>> > The arch patch *does* apply to 2.16.0 for me.
>>
>> I don't know what I did b
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:13:12PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Moving to -dev.
>
> > Comment(by ken@…):
> >
> > Replying to [comment:5 bdubbs@…]:
> > > Replying to [comment:4 ken@…]:
> > > > The arch patch *does* apply to 2.16.0 for me.
>
> I don't know what I did before, but it does apply
xinglp wrote:
> 2012/8/28 xinglp :
>> 2012/8/28 Bruce Dubbs :
>>> sed -i -e 's||"rpc/types.h"|' sunrpc/rpc_clntout.c
>> I'm tring this one
> This one got through.
Yes, I just reverted that from the change I made this morning.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
F
2012/8/28 xinglp :
> 2012/8/28 Bruce Dubbs :
>> xinglp wrote:
>>
>>> rpc_clntout.c:34:23: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory
>>> compilation terminated.
>>
>> What happens if you do this first after changing to glibc-2.16.0:
>>
>> mkdir -p /usr/include/rpc
>> cp -v sunrpc/rpc/*.h /
2012/8/28 Bruce Dubbs :
> xinglp wrote:
>
>> rpc_clntout.c:34:23: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory
>> compilation terminated.
>
> What happens if you do this first after changing to glibc-2.16.0:
>
> mkdir -p /usr/include/rpc
> cp -v sunrpc/rpc/*.h /usr/include/rpc
Same error.
>
xinglp wrote:
> rpc_clntout.c:34:23: fatal error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory
> compilation terminated.
What happens if you do this first after changing to glibc-2.16.0:
mkdir -p /usr/include/rpc
cp -v sunrpc/rpc/*.h /usr/include/rpc
Alternatively
sed -i -e 's||"rpc/types.h"|' sunrp
gcc -D_RPC_THREAD_SAFE_ -D_GNU_SOURCE -DIS_IN_build -include
/sources/glibc-build/config.h rpc_main.c \
-o /sources/glibc-build/sunrpc/cross-rpc_main.o -MMD -MP -MF
/sources/glibc-build/sunrpc/cross-rpc_main.o.dt -MT
/sources/glibc-build/sunrpc/cross-rpc_main.o -c
gcc -D_RPC_THREAD_SAFE
Moving to -dev.
> Comment(by ken@…):
>
> Replying to [comment:5 bdubbs@…]:
> > Replying to [comment:4 ken@…]:
> > > The arch patch *does* apply to 2.16.0 for me.
I don't know what I did before, but it does apply for me now. The issue
here is whether we should add it to Chapter 6 right now
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:48:41AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>>
>> I think we have corner case here. The only system that is a problem is
>> 7.1 without libtirpc being installed (or someone who didn't follow the
>> book). Now that I think of it, we could add to the host syst
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:48:41AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> I think we have corner case here. The only system that is a problem is
> 7.1 without libtirpc being installed (or someone who didn't follow the
> book). Now that I think of it, we could add to the host system
> requirements a c
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 09:30:56PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Starting a new thread.
>>
> [...]
>>
>> I'm starting to think that the problem is that we've built Chapter 6
>> glibc in 7.2 without the --enable-obsolete-rpc which would probably
>> solve the problem there. For a
16 matches
Mail list logo
