On 08/28/2012 12:43 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> The problem seems to be tricky to hit, I was going to say I didn't >> think we should carry it. But fedora are using it: >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/glibc.git/plain/glibc-rh730856.patch?h=f18 >> (dates in the patch are from earlier this year) > > Reading the Fedora messages was interesting. I went ahead and added the > patch. Looking at the book's change log, we've made 5 changes since > -rc1. The most significant were today with changes in glibc, but > standing back and looking at all the changes together, I'm not sure if > they rise to the level of needing a -rc2 release. > > What do you think? Do we need -rc2? > > -- Bruce >
Hey, thank you for adding the patch. I was unable to reproduce it with anything. It just happened twice with glibc 2.16.0 ... I used 2.14.1 for some months and it never happened there. I still don't know what causes it, but it's fine to have a fix! As for -rc2, well I guess it might be good! I am out of bugs now :P Sorry for blocking the release. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
