k...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> Author: ken
> Date: 2012-08-20 17:51:22 -0600 (Mon, 20 Aug 2012)
> New Revision: 9944
>
> Modified:
> trunk/BOOK/udev-config/ChangeLog
> trunk/BOOK/udev-config/Makefile
Ken,
udev-config/Makefile is not used any more. It's all in
trunk/udev-lfs/* now
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 14-08-2012 22:31, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
>
> Sometime before, Ken escreveu:
>
>>>Bryan, you were perspicacious. I've just spent a few hours
>>> re-energising my limited perl knowledge. First, to try to
>
>
>>
>> BTW, I had to look up perspicacious.
> Funny, th
On 2012-08-20 18:48, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Anyway, I'm glad to be back and I look forward to getting back
> working
> on the BLFS book again. I have kept up with the mailing lists, but
> not
> everything, so if I ask something that has already been discussed,
> please just say so,
Em 14-08-2012 22:31, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
Sometime before, Ken escreveu:
>> Bryan, you were perspicacious. I've just spent a few hours
>> re-energising my limited perl knowledge. First, to try to
>
> BTW, I had to look up perspicacious.
>
>-- Bruce
>
Funny, this was the easiest pa
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 08/20/12 15:50 CST:
> Who ? ;-)
Oh, just some guy that search engines took me to the LFS web site when
I was building GNOME back in early 2004!
> But seriously, Welcome Back!
Thanks, Ken. I look forward to working with you again.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 08:21:16PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Debian does not seem to
> copy the .tab files (may not be needed),
In fact, there only ever seems to have been one tab file
(zones.tab) - documentation, a table of all the timezones.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das ander
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/20/12 17:41 CST:
> I think we've got it fixed. Mailman issue. Thanks for the test.
I'm seeing almost instantaneous response now. Thanks for fixing the
problem, Bruce.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.24] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Libr
Kevin Lyda wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> My ping time from Texas to Canada is about 100ms. Could someone from
>> Europe test the response? (IP 216.171.237.234)
>
>>From a UPC cable connection in Ireland:
> ping -c 3 216.171.237.234
> PING 216.171.237.234 (216.17
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> My ping time from Texas to Canada is about 100ms. Could someone from
> Europe test the response? (IP 216.171.237.234)
>From a UPC cable connection in Ireland:
ping -c 3 216.171.237.234
PING 216.171.237.234 (216.171.237.234): 56 data bytes
64
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 16:21 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> I think it's fixed.
> Yep, looks good from here too.
+1
Uwe
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above informa
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> FWIW, I have been seeing intermittent delays of about 90 minutes all day
> today. I'm still waiting for a commit message to BLFS-BOOK from hours ago.
Same here:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
>> My ping time from Texas to Canada
Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 11:20 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Sending at 11:10 CDT (GMT+5)
>>
>> The parent message is in the mailman archives at 11:11. I emptied the
>> mailq before the test. The load on the system is 0.10.
>>
>> My ping time from Texas to
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Though some may remember me from my work in the LFS community, many
> of you will not. So, I would like to re-introduce myself. My name is
> Randy McMurchy and I have been building LFS since March of 2004. Hard
> to beli
Matt Burgess wrote these words on 08/20/12 15:04 CST:
> Pings are about right here ~300ms. That said, I was checking my email
> this morning using the web client on quantum and it saw the same delay.
>
> Odd. I'll see how things go tonight. Thanks for taking a look!
FWIW, I have been seeing in
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 11:20 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Sending at 11:10 CDT (GMT+5)
>
> The parent message is in the mailman archives at 11:11. I emptied the
> mailq before the test. The load on the system is 0.10.
>
> My ping time from Texas to Canada is about 100ms.
Hi all,
Though some may remember me from my work in the LFS community, many
of you will not. So, I would like to re-introduce myself. My name is
Randy McMurchy and I have been building LFS since March of 2004. Hard
to believe more than eight years have gone by since that first build.
Though my wo
I rebuilt svn last night with the changes from current svn below.
I use jhalfs and all the test logs in chapter 6 are placed in one
directory. Checking for 'FAIL':
grep FAIL *|grep -v 124|grep -v XFAIL
079-gcc:FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test
079-gcc:FAIL: libmudflap.c+
When I was looking at fedora, I noticed that they use another
configure switch: --enable-obsolete-rpc. Adding that installs the
rpc and rpcsvc headers (as well as the rpcsvc pascal .x files which
glibc used to install [ I looked at 2.12.2 ].
Does that seem a worthwhile change to make ? (not tes
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 07:07:23PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> >> I think that means our build process is no longer adequate for this
> >> version of glibc.
>
> That's overstating things a bit. I'm looking at how soversions.mk is
> generated. Ther
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Sending at 11:10 CDT (GMT+5)
The parent message is in the mailman archives at 11:11. I emptied the
mailq before the test. The load on the system is 0.10.
My ping time from Texas to Canada is about 100ms. Could someone from
Europe test the response? (IP 216.171.237.234)
Sending at 11:10 CDT (GMT+5)
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> And further to Ken's observation, this took about
> 2 hrs 15 to hit my inbox after posting. Bruce, would you
> mind taking a look at mailman to see if it's too busy
> processing spam or whatever it was that caused this last
> time please?
09:13:52 up 172 days, 3:25, 1 u
Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 18:09 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:12:20PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken,
You suggested separating the time zone data into a separate page.
One problem is that the tarball does not expan
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:36:49AM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
>
> I must admit, I really don't like putting 'lfs' in the tarball name.
> Can't we still use the same 'unpack; cd; build' process, if we add a
> note that one needs to use tar's --transform option? The following
> works for me:
>
> t
And further to Ken's observation, this took about
2 hrs 15 to hit my inbox after posting. Bruce, would you
mind taking a look at mailman to see if it's too busy
processing spam or whatever it was that caused this last
time please?
Thanks,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/l
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 08:21:16PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > But in the meantime I've been thinking - this is the
> > weekend, _most_ people who post are in the Northern hemisphere where
> > it is a peak holiday season : there is no need to rush into deciding
> > if we s
On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 18:09 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:12:20PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Ken,
> >> You suggested separating the time zone data into a separate page.
> >> One problem is that the tarball does not expand into a separate direct
27 matches
Mail list logo
