Re: [lfs-dev] ICA with jhalfs

2012-01-26 Thread Thomas Pegg
On 1/26/2012 12:32 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:27:04 +0100, Pierre Labastie > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA >> lately. > I use jhalfs all the time, but I've never done an ICA build with it. > >> ICA is broken becaus

Re: [lfs-dev] ICA with jhalfs

2012-01-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:27:04 +0100, Pierre Labastie > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA >> lately. > > I use jhalfs all the time, but I've never done an ICA build with it. Same here. > I monitor alfs-discuss too, bu

Re: [lfs-dev] ICA with jhalfs

2012-01-26 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 26/01/2012 19:10, Ken Moffat a ecrit : > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:27:04PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA >> lately. > I gave up on my own version of ICA ('farce') years ago - there were > too many unexplainable d

Re: [lfs-dev] Kmod-4 test error, svn revision 9714

2012-01-26 Thread Matt Burgess
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 03:17 -0700, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:11:26 +, Firerat wrote: > > Hi > > I noticed a small problem with kmod-4 in the current svn ( 9714 ) > > the book details > > > > ./test/test-loaded > > > > to perform tests, however for me this fails ( no

Re: [lfs-dev] ICA with jhalfs

2012-01-26 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:27:04PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA > lately. I gave up on my own version of ICA ('farce') years ago - there were too many unexplainable differences on x86_64, which I assumed were down to

Re: [lfs-dev] ICA with jhalfs

2012-01-26 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:27:04 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA > lately. I use jhalfs all the time, but I've never done an ICA build with it. > ICA is broken because of the part in glibc's instructions, which > instructs

[lfs-dev] ICA with jhalfs

2012-01-26 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA lately. ICA is broken because of the part in glibc's instructions, which instructs 'test-installation.pl' to look for /usr/lib rather than /tools/lib. On the second (and following) pass, the line 'DL=...' sets DL to empty (bec

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd

2012-01-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Zachary Kotlarek wrote: > And as far as ugliness goes, be sure to compare apples to apples; > you're used to sysvinit, so it's easy to ignore its flaws. But > sysvinit uses a whole set of folders and symlinks in /etc that > contain a lot of highly-redunant files to communicate a tiny amount > of i

Re: [lfs-dev] Kmod-4 test error, svn revision 9714

2012-01-26 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:11:26 +, Firerat wrote: > Hi > I noticed a small problem with kmod-4 in the current svn ( 9714 ) > the book details > > ./test/test-loaded > > to perform tests, however for me this fails ( no file found ) > if I instead do > > make check > > the tests are per

[lfs-dev] Kmod-4 test error, svn revision 9714

2012-01-26 Thread Firerat
Hi I noticed a small problem with kmod-4 in the current svn ( 9714 ) the book details ./test/test-loaded to perform tests, however for me this fails ( no file found ) if I instead do make check the tests are performed -- Firerat Talented, Witty And Thoughtful .. is how most describe